Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37899148›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Investigating mortality and morbidity associated with UrINary incontinence during Older Womens Secondary Care Admissions and exploring nurses experiences of delivering related care (U-INconti): a mixed methods research protocol.

Heather Iles-Smith, Isobel May McMillan, Trina Evans-Cheung, Ruth Haas Eckersley, Margaret Russell, Julie Wood, Robyn Emelda McCarthy, Lyndsey Rosson, Liz Doxford-Hook, Yu Fu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Heather Iles-SmithSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK H.M.Iles-Smith@salford.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0520-2694
Isobel May McMillanSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-2198
Trina Evans-CheungResearch and Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0899-5383
Ruth Haas EckersleyRochdale Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0506-9985
Margaret RussellSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK.
Julie WoodSalford Community Bladder and Bowel Services, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK.
Robyn Emelda McCarthySchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Lyndsey RossonSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Liz Doxford-HookFaculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-5555
Yu FuDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4972-0626
Linda McGowanFaculty of Medicine & Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Salford · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNorthern Health and Social Care Trust · GBRochdale Infirmary · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUrinary incontinence (UI) is associated with increasing age and is more frequently experienced by women. Despite 40% prevalence in the community, little is known about the prevalence/incidence of UI in older women during hospital admission. UI during hospital admissions, within this group, has also been under-researched in terms of its relationship to specific clinical conditions and mortality rates. Given that UI has serious implications for both patient care and women's general health and well-being on discharge, this protocol describes a planned research project which aims to determine mortality, morbidity, prevalence and incidence of UI in older women (≥55 years) during hospital admission to inform nursing practice. Additionally, it aims to explore the experience of nurses who deliver women's care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an explanatory mixed-methods study consisting of two phases: (1) retrospecitive analysis of electronic patient care records (EPCR) to determine prevalence/incidence of UI, clinical conditions most likely associated with UI and any associations between UI and death, (2) nurse interviews to explore views, knowledge and perceptions of performing the nursing assessment and providing care for older women (≥55 years) with UI during admission. EPCR will be gained from a National Health Service (NHS) teaching hospital. Nurse interviews will be conducted with nurses from an alternative but similar-sized NHS hospital. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is provided by the University of Salford Ethics Committee and regulatory approval by the NHS Health Research Authority (Integrated Research Application System project ID: 303118). Local NHS trust approval to access electronic care records for the purposes of analysis of anonymised data has been provided by one of the two collaborating NHS hospitals. Findings will be disseminated through open-access geriatric or urogynaecology journals and presented to relevant stakeholders at local, national and international meetings including scientific meetings such as the UK Continence Society and International Continence Society.

Indexed as

Secondary Health CareUrinary IncontinenceAgedEndothelial Protein C ReceptorFemaleHumansIncidenceState MedicineEndothelial Protein C ReceptorBladder disordersQuality in health careUrinary incontinencesUrogynaecologyUROLOGY

Identifiers

PMID37899148
PMCPMC10619080
OpenAlexW4388009714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.