Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37898818›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study.

Grégoire P Chatain, Alton Oldham, Juan Uribe, Bradley Duhon, Michael J Gardner, Jens-Peter Witt, Scott Yerby, Brian P Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Grégoire P ChatainDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12605 E 16Th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. gregoire.chatain@cuanschutz.edu.
Alton OldhamSpinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Juan UribeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Bradley DuhonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12605 E 16Th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Michael J GardnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Jens-Peter WittDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12605 E 16Th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Scott YerbySI-BONE, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Brian P KellySpinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USBarrow Neurological Institute · USSI-Bone (United States) · USStanford University · USSt. Joseph's Hospital · USSt. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIliosacral screw placement is ubiquitous and now part of the surgeon's pelvic trauma armamentarium. More recent evidence supports sacroiliac arthrodesis for treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in select patients. Regardless of the surgical indication, there are currently no studies examining lag screw compression biomechanics across the SIJ. The objective of this biomechanical investigation was to quantify iliosacral implant compressive loads and to examine the insertion torque and compressive load profile over time.

methodsEight human cadaveric pelvic specimens underwent SIJ fixation at S1 and S2 using 11.5 and 10.0 mm iFuse-TORQ Lag implants, respectively, and standard 7.3 mm trauma lag screws. Load decay analysis was performed, and insertion and removal torques were measured.

resultsFor both implants at S1 and S2 levels, the load relaxed 50% in approximately 67 min. Compressive load decay was approximately 70% on average occurring approximately 15 h post-insertion. Average insertion torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant at S1 was significantly greater than the trauma lag screw. Similarly, at S2, insertion torque of the 10.0 mm TORQ implant was greater than the trauma lag screw. At S1, removal torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant was higher than the trauma lag screw; there was no significant difference in the removal torque at S2.

conclusionsIn this study, we found that a novel posterior pelvic implant with a larger diameter, roughened surface, and dual pitch threads achieved improved insertion and removal torques compared to a standard screw. Load relaxation characteristics were similar between all implants.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalSacroiliac JointBiomechanical PhenomenaBone ScrewsCadaverHumansSacrumBiomechanicsFusionLag screwSacroiliac jointTrauma

Identifiers

PMID37898818
PMCPMC10613391
OpenAlexW4388000681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.