Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37898817›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2023

Evaluating the risk of endometriosis based on patients' self-assessment questionnaires.

Krystian Zieliński, Dajana Drabczyk, Michał Kunicki, Damian Drzyzga, Anna Kloska, Jacek Rumiński

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krystian ZielińskiINVICTA, Research and Development Center, Sopot, Poland. krystian.zielinski@invicta.pl.
Dajana DrabczykINVICTA, Research and Development Center, Sopot, Poland.
Michał KunickiINVICTA, Research and Development Center, Sopot, Poland.
Damian DrzyzgaINVICTA, Research and Development Center, Sopot, Poland.
Anna KloskaINVICTA, Research and Development Center, Sopot, Poland. anna.kloska@ug.edu.pl.
Jacek RumińskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLGdańsk University of Technology · PL

Funding

National Center for Research and Development POIR.01.01.01-00-0390/21-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a condition that significantly affects the quality of life of about 10 % of reproductive-aged women. It is characterized by the presence of tissue similar to the uterine lining (endometrium) outside the uterus, which can lead lead scarring, adhesions, pain, and fertility issues. While numerous factors associated with endometriosis are documented, a wide range of symptoms may still be undiscovered.

methodsIn this study, we employed machine learning algorithms to predict endometriosis based on the patient symptoms extracted from 13,933 questionnaires. We compared the results of feature selection obtained from various algorithms (i.e., Boruta algorithm, Recursive Feature Selection) with experts' decisions. As a benchmark model architecture, we utilized a LightGBM algorithm, along with Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN), for missing data imputation. Our primary objective was to assess the model's performance and feature importance compared to existing studies.

resultsWe identified the top 20 predictors of endometriosis, uncovering previously overlooked features such as Cesarean section, ovarian cysts, and hernia. Notably, the model's performance metrics were maximized when utilizing a combination of multiple feature selection methods. Specifically, the final model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 on the training dataset and an AUC of 0.82 on the testing dataset.

conclusionsThe application of machine learning in diagnosing endometriosis has the potential to significantly impact clinical practice, streamlining the diagnostic process and enhancing efficiency. Our questionnaire-based prediction approach empowers individuals with endometriosis to proactively identify potential symptoms, facilitating informed discussions with healthcare professionals about diagnosis and treatment options.

Indexed as

EndometriosisAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPregnancyQuality of LifeSelf-AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesEndometriosisFertilityMachine learningQuestionnaireSymptom-based prediction

Identifiers

PMID37898817
PMCPMC10612251
OpenAlexW4388035166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.