ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2023
Evaluating the risk of endometriosis based on patients' self-assessment questionnaires.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Physician Communication, Repeated Healthcare Encounters, and Diagnostic Delay in Endometriosis: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Endometriosis by Questionnaires in Patients Using Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Learning Guided Binary PSO Algorithm for Feature Selection and Reconstruction of Ultrasound Contrast Images in Endometrial Region Detection.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Current Status and Future Potential of Machine Learning in Diagnostic Imaging of Endometriosis : A Literature Review.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Review
- Unraveling the significance of AGPAT4 for the pathogenesis of endometriosis via a multi-omics approach.Human genetics · 2024Article
- Causal association between telomere length and female reproductive endocrine diseases: a univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2024Article
- Effects of bazedoxifene on endometriosis in experimental animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Nonsurgical approaches to the diagnosis and evaluation of endometriosis.Fertility and sterility · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndometriosis is a condition that significantly affects the quality of life of about 10 % of reproductive-aged women. It is characterized by the presence of tissue similar to the uterine lining (endometrium) outside the uterus, which can lead lead scarring, adhesions, pain, and fertility issues. While numerous factors associated with endometriosis are documented, a wide range of symptoms may still be undiscovered.
methodsIn this study, we employed machine learning algorithms to predict endometriosis based on the patient symptoms extracted from 13,933 questionnaires. We compared the results of feature selection obtained from various algorithms (i.e., Boruta algorithm, Recursive Feature Selection) with experts' decisions. As a benchmark model architecture, we utilized a LightGBM algorithm, along with Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN), for missing data imputation. Our primary objective was to assess the model's performance and feature importance compared to existing studies.
resultsWe identified the top 20 predictors of endometriosis, uncovering previously overlooked features such as Cesarean section, ovarian cysts, and hernia. Notably, the model's performance metrics were maximized when utilizing a combination of multiple feature selection methods. Specifically, the final model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 on the training dataset and an AUC of 0.82 on the testing dataset.
conclusionsThe application of machine learning in diagnosing endometriosis has the potential to significantly impact clinical practice, streamlining the diagnostic process and enhancing efficiency. Our questionnaire-based prediction approach empowers individuals with endometriosis to proactively identify potential symptoms, facilitating informed discussions with healthcare professionals about diagnosis and treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.