Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37898778›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

The role of the partner in the support of a pregnant woman's healthy diet: an explorative qualitative study.

Renske M van Lonkhuijzen, Hanna Rustenhoven, Jeanne H M de Vries, Annemarie Wagemakers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Postpartum OGTT Non-Adherence in Regional and Rural Australia: A Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renske M van LonkhuijzenDepartment of Social Sciences, Health and Society, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, bode 60, Wageningen, 6706, KN, The Netherlands. renske.vanlonkhuijzen@wur.nl.
Hanna RustenhovenDianet, Brennerbaan 130, Utrecht, 3524 BN, The Netherlands.
Jeanne H M de VriesDepartment of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, bode 62, Wageningen, 6708, WE, The Netherlands.
Annemarie WagemakersDepartment of Social Sciences, Health and Society, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, bode 60, Wageningen, 6706, KN, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLDianet · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActive partner involvement during pregnancy is an effective strategy to enhance both maternal and newborn health outcomes. The presence of a supportive partner equips women with a heightened sense of empowerment to deal with the challenges of pregnancy, including maintaining a healthy diet during pregnancy, which is important for the health of both the mother and child. However, little information exists regarding the partner's role in encouraging a pregnant woman's healthy dietary choices. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of pregnant women and their partners concerning the partner's role in promoting a healthy dietary intake during pregnancy.

methodsSixteen semi-structured couple interviews were conducted in the Netherlands, involving expecting couples. Based on Berkman's social networks and support theory, we categorized various forms of support as emotional, instrumental, appraisal, and informational. The interviews were accurately recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using an inductive approach.

resultsIn general, pregnant women reported being positive regarding the support they received from their partners. Partners primarily offered instrumental support to pregnant women, such as cooking, grocery shopping, and helping them avoid unsafe foods. Partners provided informational support, mainly about foods considered unsafe during pregnancy. Emotional support was relatively less common. The primary motives for giving support were pregnancy-related symptoms, the importance of the health of the mother and baby, and solidarity with the pregnant woman. Support from the partner was more willingly accepted by pregnant women if the support was perceived as being helpful, showing involvement, and positive. Conversely, partner support was not accepted if it was perceived as judgmental or unwanted.

conclusionsThe majority of pregnant women were satisfied with the support received from their partners, although there are opportunities for a partner to provide more support to improve the dietary intake of pregnant women. To optimise this support, partners are advised to tailor their support to the needs and expectations of pregnant women. Personalizing dietary support can be achieved by couples communicating their dietary wishes and expectations regarding support.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyInterpersonal RelationsPregnant PeopleFemaleHumansMalePregnancyQualitative ResearchDietary intakeEmpowermentPartner supportPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37898778
PMCPMC10612286
OpenAlexW4388001997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.