ArticleScientific reports2023
Spatial correlation of 2D hard-tissue histology with 3D microCT scans through 3D printed phantoms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Registration-based 3D Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy and 2D histology image fusion tool for pathological specimen.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multidimensional lung imaging: integrated preclinical platforms enabling the identification of translational biomarkers for pulmonary research.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- X-ray contrast-adjustable 3D printing for multimodal fusion of microCT and histology.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hard-tissue histology-the analysis of thin two-dimensional (2D) sections-is hampered by the opaque nature of most biological specimens, especially bone. Therefore, the cutting process cannot be assigned to regions of interest. In addition, the applied cutting-grinding method is characterized by significant material loss. As a result, relevant structures might be missed or destroyed, and 3D features can hardly be evaluated. Here, we present a novel workflow, based on conventual microCT scans of the specimen prior to the cutting process, to be used for the analysis of 3D structural features and for directing the sectioning process to the regions of interest. 3D printed fiducial markers, embedded together with the specimen in resin, are utilized to retrospectively register the obtained 2D histological images into the 3D anatomical context. This not only allows to identify the cutting position, but also enables the co-registration of the cell and extracellular matrix morphological analysis to local 3D information obtained from the microCT data. We have successfully applied our new approach to assess hard-tissue specimens of different species. After matching the predicted microCT cut plane with the histology image, we validated a high accuracy of the registration process by computing quality measures namely Jaccard and Dice similarity coefficients achieving an average score of 0.90 ± 0.04 and 0.95 ± 0.02, respectively. Thus, we believe that the novel, easy to implement correlative imaging approach holds great potential for improving the reliability and diagnostic power of classical hard-tissue histology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.