ArticleScientific reports2023
Artificial intelligence-based framework for precise prediction of asphaltene particle aggregation kinetics in petroleum recovery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced petrophysical evaluation through machine learning and well logging data in an Iranian oil field.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precipitation and deposition of asphaltene on solid surfaces present a significant challenge throughout all stages of petroleum recovery, from hydrocarbon reservoirs in porous media to wellbore and transfer pipelines. A comprehensive understanding of asphaltene aggregation phenomena is crucial for controlling deposition issues. In addition to experimental studies, accurate prediction of asphaltene aggregation kinetics, which has received less attention in previous research, is essential. This study proposes an artificial intelligence-based framework for precisely predicting asphaltene particle aggregation kinetics. Different techniques were utilized to predict the asphaltene aggregate diameter as a function of pressure, temperature, oil specific gravity, and oil asphaltene content. These methods included the adaptive neuro-fuzzy interference system (ANFIS), radial basis function (RBF) neural network optimized with the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) algorithm, extreme learning machine (ELM), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) coupled with Bayesian Regularization (BR), Levenberg-Marquardt (LM), and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) algorithms. The models were constructed using a series of published data. The results indicate the excellent correlation between predicted and experimental values using various models. However, the GWO-RBF modeling strategy demonstrated the highest accuracy among the developed models, with a determination coefficient, average absolute relative deviation percent, and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.9993, 1.1326%, and 0.0537, respectively, for the total data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.