Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37898663›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

XMAP: Cross-population fine-mapping by leveraging genetic diversity and accounting for confounding bias.

Mingxuan Cai, Zhiwei Wang, Jiashun Xiao, Xianghong Hu, Gang Chen, Can Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A unified framework for identification of cell-type-specific spatially variable genes in spatial transcriptomic studies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetics, transcriptomics, metagenomics, and metabolomics in the pathogenesis and prediction of atrial fibrillation.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Improved multi-ancestry fine-mapping identifiesmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mingxuan CaiDepartment of Biostatistics, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. mingxcai@cityu.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0003-4011-8292
Zhiwei WangGuangzhou HKUST Fok Ying Tung Research Institute, Guangzhou, 511458, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-0070
Jiashun XiaoShenzhen Research Institute of Big Data, Shenzhen, 518172, China.
Xianghong HuGuangzhou HKUST Fok Ying Tung Research Institute, Guangzhou, 511458, China.
Gang ChenHunan Provincial Key Lab on Bioinformatics, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China.
Can YangGuangzhou HKUST Fok Ying Tung Research Institute, Guangzhou, 511458, China. macyang@ust.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-4407-3055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine-mapping prioritizes risk variants identified by genome-wide association studies (GWASs), serving as a critical step to uncover biological mechanisms underlying complex traits. However, several major challenges still remain for existing fine-mapping methods. First, the strong linkage disequilibrium among variants can limit the statistical power and resolution of fine-mapping. Second, it is computationally expensive to simultaneously search for multiple causal variants. Third, the confounding bias hidden in GWAS summary statistics can produce spurious signals. To address these challenges, we develop a statistical method for cross-population fine-mapping (XMAP) by leveraging genetic diversity and accounting for confounding bias. By using cross-population GWAS summary statistics from global biobanks and genomic consortia, we show that XMAP can achieve greater statistical power, better control of false positive rate, and substantially higher computational efficiency for identifying multiple causal signals, compared to existing methods. Importantly, we show that the output of XMAP can be integrated with single-cell datasets, which greatly improves the interpretation of putative causal variants in their cellular context at single-cell resolution.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait LociGenetic VariationLinkage DisequilibriumMultifactorial InheritancePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID37898663
PMCPMC10613261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.