ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2024
Intracavernosal pressure of the erect penis in children with hypospadias.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Response to the Commentary on: Intracavernosal pressure of the erect penis in children with hypospadias.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study objective is to examine the intracavernosal pressure (ICP) in hypospadias boys with and without previous corporotomies. Retrospectively, the ICPs that were measured routinely as part of the artificial erection test in boys who underwent hypospadias repair were collected. The measurement (mmHg) included a slow manual saline instillation and a 21-gauge needle in the corpora cavernosa, which was connected to a pressure monitor. The full and rigid erections were defined according to the Erection Hardness Score by agreement between the two surgeons operating on the patient. Included were 61 boys with a median age of 15 months (IQR 8-27). Group A included 32 boys with coronal, subcoronal, or penile hypospadias. Group B included 29 boys with penoscrotal, scrotal, and perineal hypospadias. The median pressures at full erection for Groups A and B were 71.5 (IQR 59-79) and 62.5 (IQR 48-71) (p = 0.036), respectively, and at rigid erection were 283 (IQR 219-310) and 237 (IQR 182-278) (p = 0.032), respectively. In group B, median pressures at full erection for boys with and without previous corporotomies were 53.5 (IQR 45-65) and 69 (IQR 57-82), respectively (p = 0.001), and at rigid erection were 189.5 (IQR 113-263) and 264.5 (IQR 226-298), respectively (p = 0.003). In a comparison between group A boys to 18 boys in group B who did not have corporotomies, the median pressures at full erection were 71.5 (IQR 59-79) and 69 (IQR 57-82), respectively (p = 0.9), and at rigid erection were 283 (IQR 219-310) and 264 (IQR 226-298), respectively (p = 0.86). In conclusion, ICPs of artificial erections are lower in proximal hypospadias and in boys with previous corporotomies. The durability and the implications of these pressures require further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.