SynthesisScientific reports2023
Effectiveness of acute myocardial infarction interventions on selected outcomes among community dwelling-older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of a concerning older adult abilities health education program to promote appropriate decision among acute myocardial infarction patients.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effects of health education applying role play on decision making in acute myocardial infarction situation among older adults in community.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Changes in Coronary Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction over the Past Two Decades (2000-2023) in Kaunas, Lithuania.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A qualitative study of patient experiences and expectations around hospital care during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a health CASCADE study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Literature Overview.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The older adult is an influential group experiencing acute myocardial infarction, delaying treatment and causing a high mortality rate. Factors related to their delay differ from other age groups, and their specific characteristics are barriers to recognizing their symptoms and learning new information. Therefore, specific innovative methods related to their limitations and needs should be considered when developing interventions promoting on-time treatment. This study aims to review intervention details and their effects on knowledge, belief, decision-making, rate of calling 911, and mortality among community-dwelling older adults at risk or after a first myocardial infarction compared to receiving usual care or no intervention. The 12 databases were searched unlimitedly until July 30, 2022. The two researchers independently reviewed the articles, and the third reviewer broke the tight when disagreement was found. Data were extracted, kinds of interventions were grouped, and intervention details were summarized narratively. Finally, the selected outcomes were analyzed by meta-analysis using a fixed and a random-effects model. Eleven articles were for final review. Interventions were categorized into eight groups: direct mail, community-based, multi-group health education, innovation methods, tailored education, structured education, tricked intervention promoting memory and concern, and nurse-based case management. Finally, the meta-analysis found that only innovative methods could increase the rate of calling 911 and taking aspirin (Odd ratio = 2.55; 95% CI = 1.01-6.44). In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of affecting time to first unplanned readmission or death and time delay to the emergency room. Results recommended that effective and specific interventions must be developed and strengthened to promote older adults surviving acute myocardial infarction.Clinical Trial Registration Number: PROSPERO CRD42021247136.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.