Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37898185›Full record

ArticleChest2024

Use and Outcomes of Peripheral Vasopressors in Early Sepsis-Induced Hypotension Across Michigan Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Elizabeth S Munroe, Megan E Heath, Mousab Eteer, Hayley B Gershengorn, Jennifer K Horowitz, Jessica Jones, Scott Kaatz, Maximiliano Tamae Kakazu, Elizabeth McLaughlin, Scott A Flanders and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06920173 (The PULSE Study - The Peripheral Use of Low-dose Vasopressors for Safety and Efficacy in the Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06920173 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The PULSE Study - The Peripheral Use of Low-dose Vasopressors for Safety and Efficacy in the Intensive Care Unit: a Pilot Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKingston Health Sciences CentreRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsShock, Peripheral Venous Catheterization, Central Venous Catheterization, Critically Ill Patients Admitted in ICUArmsExperiemental: Peripheral Venous Catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Overview of Peripheral Vasopressor Use in an Academic Health System.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [What is confirmed in the treatment of sepsis? : An update].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Venous access devices (Review).Medicine international
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth S MunroeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: munroeel@med.umich.edu.
Megan E HeathDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; The Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium Coordinating Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
Mousab EteerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain Management, and Perioperative Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI.
Hayley B GershengornDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Jennifer K HorowitzDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; The Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium Coordinating Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jessica JonesDepartment of Pharmacy, Corewell Health, Dearborn, MI.
Scott KaatzDivision of Hospital Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI.
Maximiliano Tamae KakazuCorewell Health, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI.
Elizabeth McLaughlinDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; The Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium Coordinating Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
Scott A FlandersDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Hallie C PrescottDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
University of Michigan · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USCorewell HealthHenry Ford Health System · USHenry Ford Hospital · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

PULMONARY CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TRAININGT32HL007749 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Pickett Dickson · 1993 to 2026
$19.9M
Optimizing Vasopressor Delivery in Early SepsisF32HL172463 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUNROE, ELIZABETH · 2024 to 2025
$108k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL172463NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL170379NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasopressors traditionally are administered via central access, but newer data suggest that peripheral administration may be safe and may avoid delays and complications associated with central line placement. RESEARCH QUESTION: How commonly are vasopressors initiated through peripheral IV lines in routine practice? Is vasopressor initiation route associated with in-hospital mortality? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included adults hospitalized with sepsis (November 2020-September 2022) at 29 hospitals in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, a Collaborative Quality Initiative sponsored by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. We assessed route of early vasopressor initiation, factors and outcomes associated with peripheral initiation, and timing of central line placement.

resultsFive hundred ninety-four patients received vasopressors within 6 h of hospital arrival and were included in this study. Peripheral vasopressor initiation was common (400/594 [67.3%]). Patients with peripheral vs central initiation were similar; BMI was the only patient factor associated independently with initiation route (adjusted OR [aOR] of peripheral initiation [per 1-kg/m

interpretationPeripheral vasopressor initiation was common across Michigan hospitals and had practical benefits, including expedited vasopressor administration and avoidance of central line placement in one-third of patients. However, the findings of wide practice variation that was not explained by patient case mix and lower use of first-line norepinephrine with peripheral administration suggest that additional standardization may be needed.

Indexed as

HypotensionHypotension, ControlledSepsisShock, SepticHumansMichiganNorepinephrineRetrospective StudiesVasoconstrictor AgentsNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor Agentscentral accesscentral linecentral venous catheterhypotensionperipheral vasopressorsepsisseptic shockvasoactive medicationvasopressor

Identifiers

PMID37898185
PMCPMC11214906
OpenAlexW4388007445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.