Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37898104›Full record

ArticleJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2024

Cerebral hemodynamics and stroke risks in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with internal versus cortical borderzone infarcts: A computational fluid dynamics study.

Shuang Li, Xuan Tian, Bonaventure Ip, Xueyan Feng, Hing Lung Ip, Jill Abrigo, Linfang Lan, Haipeng Liu, Lina Zheng, Yuying Liu and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shuang LiDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4834-1301
Xuan TianDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4983-209X
Bonaventure IpDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xueyan FengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hing Lung IpDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jill AbrigoDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Linfang LanDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Haipeng LiuResearch Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Lina ZhengDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-0351
Yuying LiuDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Karen Ky MaDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Florence Sy FanDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sze Ho MaDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hui FangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yuming XuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Alexander Y LauDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Howan LeungDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yannie Oy SooDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Vincent Ct MokDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ka Sing WongDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xinyi LengDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Thomas W LeungDepartment of Medicine & Therapeutics, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNCapital Medical University · CNIntelligent Health (United Kingdom) · GBSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There may be different mechanisms underlying internal (IBZ) and cortical (CBZ) borderzone infarcts in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. In 84 patients with symptomatic, 50-99% atherosclerotic stenosis of M1 middle cerebral artery (MCA-M1) with acute borderzone infarcts in diffusion-weighted imaging, we classified the infarct patterns as isolated IBZ (n = 37), isolated CBZ (n = 31), and IBZ+CBZ (n = 16) infarcts. CT angiography-based computational fluid dynamics models were constructed to quantify translesional, post-stenotic to pre-stenotic pressure ratio (PR) in the MCA-M1 lesion. Those with IBZ infarcts were more likely to have a low PR (indicating impaired antegrade flow across the lesion) than those without (p = 0.012), and those with CBZ infarcts were more likely to have coexisting small cortical infarcts (indicating possible embolism) than those without (p = 0.004). In those with isolated IBZ or CBZ infarcts, low PR was independently associated with isolated IBZ infarcts (adjusted odds ratio = 4.223; p = 0.026). These two groups may also have different trajectories in the stroke risks under current medical treatment regimen, with a higher risk of same-territory ischemic stroke recurrence within 3 months in patients with isolated IBZ infarcts than isolated CBZ infarcts (17.9% versus 0.0%; log-rank p = 0.023), but similar risks later in 1 year.

Indexed as

Intracranial ArteriosclerosisStrokeConstriction, PathologicHemodynamicsHumansHydrodynamicsInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryBorderzone infarctcerebral hemodynamicsintracranial atherosclerotic diseaseischemic strokeprognosis

Identifiers

PMID37898104
PMCPMC10981396
OpenAlexW4388007158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.