Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37897927›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2023

Live-cell imaging in the deep learning era.

Joanna W Pylvänäinen, Estibaliz Gómez-de-Mariscal, Ricardo Henriques, Guillaume Jacquemet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Beyond the membrane: rethinking EGFR signaling in physiology and cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Leveraging AI for cell biology discovery.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Time, the final frontier.Molecular oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanna W PylvänäinenFaculty of Science and Engineering, Cell Biology, Åbo Akademi, University, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Estibaliz Gómez-de-MariscalInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal.
Ricardo HenriquesInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal; University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Guillaume JacquemetFaculty of Science and Engineering, Cell Biology, Åbo Akademi, University, 20520 Turku, Finland; Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, 20520, Turku, Finland; InFLAMES Research Flagship Center, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, 20520 Turku, Finland; Turku Bioimaging, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FI- 20520 Turku, Finland. Electronic address: guillaume.jacquemet@abo.fi.

Funding

European Research Council 101001332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live imaging is a powerful tool, enabling scientists to observe living organisms in real time. In particular, when combined with fluorescence microscopy, live imaging allows the monitoring of cellular components with high sensitivity and specificity. Yet, due to critical challenges (i.e., drift, phototoxicity, dataset size), implementing live imaging and analyzing the resulting datasets is rarely straightforward. Over the past years, the development of bioimage analysis tools, including deep learning, is changing how we perform live imaging. Here we briefly cover important computational methods aiding live imaging and carrying out key tasks such as drift correction, denoising, super-resolution imaging, artificial labeling, tracking, and time series analysis. We also cover recent advances in self-driving microscopy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMicroscopy, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID37897927
PMCPMC7618379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.