Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37897688›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2023

Mechanical failure analysis of patch materials used in aortic arch reconstruction: implications for clinical practice.

Dominic P Recco, Shannen B Kizilski, Lauren E Marshall, Patrick D Earley, Nicholas E Kneier, Pedro J Del Nido, Peter E Hammer, David M Hoganson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Role of the TGFZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominic P ReccoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2306-6443
Shannen B KizilskiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Lauren E MarshallDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick D EarleyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicholas E KneierDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Pedro J Del NidoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter E HammerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4151-2777
David M HogansonDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Pediatric Surgeon-Scientist Training Program in Vascular DiseasesT32HD104582 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Joyce E. Bischoff, Arin K. Greene · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD104582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThick-patch pulmonary homograft, autologous pericardium and CardioCel Neo are common patch materials for aortic arch reconstruction. Insufficient data exist on sutured patch strength and limits of use. We evaluated failure strength of these materials to develop a failure prediction model for clinical guidance.

methodsPatch failure strength was evaluated via sutured uniaxial and burst pressure testing. In sutured uniaxial testing, patches were sutured to aortic or Dacron tabs and pulled to failure. In burst pressure testing, patches were sewn into porcine aortas or Dacron grafts and pressurized to failure. Failure membrane tension was calculated. A prediction model of membrane tension versus vessel diameter was generated to guide clinical patch selection.

resultsCombining sutured uniaxial and burst pressure test data, pulmonary homograft failure strength {0.61 [interquartile range (IQR): 0.44, 0.78] N/mm, n = 21} was less than half that of autologous pericardium [2.22 (IQR: 1.65, 2.78) N/mm, n = 15] and CardioCel Neo [1.31 (IQR: 1.20, 1.42) N/mm, n = 20]. Pulmonary homograft burst pressure [245 (IQR: 202, 343) mmHg, n = 7] was significantly lower than autologous pericardium [863 (IQR: 802, 919) mmHg, n = 6] and CardioCel Neo [766 (IQR: 721, 833) mmHg, n = 6]. Our model predicts failure limits for each patch material and outlines safety margins for combinations of aortic diameter and pressure.

conclusionsSutured failure strength of thick-patch pulmonary homograft was significantly lower than autologous pericardium and CardioCel Neo. Patient selection (predicted postoperative arch diameter and haemodynamics) and blood pressure management must be considered when choosing patch material for arch reconstruction. In older children and adolescents, autologous or bovine pericardium may be more suitable materials for aortic patch augmentation to minimize the risk of postoperative patch failure.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicPolyethylene TerephthalatesAdolescentAnimalsAortaBlood PressureCattleChildHemodynamicsHumansPericardiumRetrospective StudiesSwinePolyethylene TerephthalatesAortic arch reconstructionBiomechanicsCongenital heart diseaseMaterial propertiesPericardiumPulmonary homograft

Identifiers

PMID37897688
PMCPMC11005168
OpenAlexW4388007238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.