ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024
Improving the depiction of small intracranial vessels in head computed tomography angiography: a comparative analysis of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning reconstruction for improved image quality of ultra-high-resolution brain CT angiography: application in moyamoya disease.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) compared to that of hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) to depict small vessels on computed tomography (CT). DLR and two types of hybrid IRs were used for image reconstruction. The target vessels were the basilar artery (BA), superior cerebellar artery (SCA), anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA), and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). The peak value, ΔCT values defined as the difference between the peak value and background, and full width at half maximum (FWHM), were obtained from the profile curves. In all target vessels, the peak and ΔCT values of DLR were significantly higher than those of the two types of hybrid IR (p < 0.001). Compared to that associated with hybrid IR, the FWHM of DLR was significantly lower in the SCA (p < 0.001), AICA (p < 0.001), and PICA (p < 0.001). In conclusion, DLR has the potential to improve visualization of small vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.