Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Diagnostic accuracy of fully hybrid [
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gallium-Containing Agents for Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy: Current Status and Future Prospects.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-targeted positron-emission tomography in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Redefining Prostate Cancer Precision: Radiogenomics, Theragnostics, and AI-Driven Biomarkers.Cancers · 2025Review
- Phase I Clinical Study with the GRPR-Antagonist [Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- RM2 and DB15 analogues bearing [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025Article
- Using radiomics model for predicting extraprostatic extension with PSMA PET/CT studies: a comparative study with the Mehralivand grading system.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Update on PSMA-based Prostate Cancer Imaging.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2024Review
- Case report: positive pitfalls of PSMA PET/CT: diagnostic challenges in degenerative bone lesions including MODIC type 1.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of PET/MRI with [
methodsSixty patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center phase II clinical trial from June 2020 to October 2022. Forty-four/60 completed all study examinations and were available at follow-up (median: 22.8 months, range: 6-31.5 months). Two nuclear medicine physicians analyzed PET images and two radiologists interpreted MRI; images were then re-examined to produce an integrated PET/MRI report for both [
resultsPatients' median age was 69.8 years (interquartile range (IQR): 61.8-75.1) and median PSA level at time of imaging was 0.53 ng/mL (IQR: 0.33-2.04). During follow-up, evidence of recurrence was observed in 31/44 patients. Combining MRI with [
conclusionThis study brings further evidence on the utility of fully hybrid PET/MRI for disease characterization in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa. Imaging with [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.