Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37897598›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Modeling Xylem Functionality Aspects.

Alex Tavkhelidze, Gerhard Buck-Sorlin, Winfried Kurth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex TavkhelidzeGeorg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. aleksi.tavkhelidze@uni-goettingen.de.
Gerhard Buck-SorlinIRHS, INRAE, Institut Agro Rennes-Angers, Université d'Angers, SFR 4207 QUASAV, Beaucouzé, France.
Winfried KurthGeorg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depending on the questions to be answered, water flow in the xylem can be modelled following different approaches with varying spatial and temporal resolution. When focussing on the influence of hydraulic architecture upon flow dynamics, distribution of water potentials in a tree crown or questions of vulnerability of the hydraulic system, functional-structural plant models, which link representations of morphological structure with simulated processes and with a virtual environment, can be a promising tool. Such a model will then include a network of idealized xylem segments, each representing the conducting part of a stem or branch segment, and a numerical machinery suitable for solving a system of differential equations on it reflecting the hydrodynamic laws, which are the basis of the broadly accepted cohesion-tension theory of water flow in plants. We will discuss functional-structural plant models, the simplifications that are useful for hydraulic simulations within this framework, the deduction of the used differential equations from basic physical conservation laws, and their numerical solution, as well as additional necessary models of radiation, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance. In some supplementary notes, we are shortly addressing some related questions, for example, about root systems or about the relation between macro-scale hydraulic parameters and fine-grained (anatomical) xylem structure.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlant TranspirationPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesWaterXylemWaterDarcy’s lawFluid dynamicsFunctional-structural plant modelingGroIMPHagen-Poiseuille equationWater flowXylem

Identifiers

PMID37897598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.