ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Pelvic floor symptoms among premenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Clinic and Management of a Prolapsed Gravid Uterus Incarcerated Through the Anal Orifice in the Resource-Limited Setting: A Case Report.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Premenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor symptoms at a tertiary hospital in Thailand: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMost of the literature on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been generated from postmenopausal patients in high-income countries. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a significant proportion of patients who present for surgical management of POP are premenopausal. Little is known about the impact of POP on pelvic floor symptoms in this population. The objective was to describe pelvic floor symptoms and sexual function among premenopausal patients presenting for POP surgery in DRC.
methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study of symptomatic premenopausal patients undergoing fertility-sparing POP surgery at a large referral hospital in the DRC. Pelvic floor symptoms were evaluated with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire and sexual function with the Pelvic organ prolapse/urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Data are presented as means with standard deviations or counts with percentages.
resultsA total of 107 patients were recruited between April 2019 and December 2021. All had either stage III (95.3%) or stage IV (4.7%) prolapse. Ages were 34.2 ± 6.7 years; 78.5% were married. A majority of patients experienced low abdominal pain (82.2%), heaviness or dullness (95.3%), and bulging or protrusion of the prolapse (92.5%). Almost two-thirds of patients reported no longer being sexually active, and 80% stated that they were not sexually active because of POP. Of the 37 sexually active patients (34.6%), nearly all reported significant sexual impairment because of the prolapse, with only 4 reporting no sexual impairment.
conclusionsThis study represents one of the largest prospective series of patients with premenopausal POP. Our results highlight the severity of pelvic floor symptoms and the negative effects on sexual function among this patient population with POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.