Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37897263›Full record

Observational studyJCO clinical cancer informatics2023

Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study.

Debra A Patt, Amila Meera Patel, Arun Bhardwaj, Kathryn Elizabeth Hudson, Amanda Christman, Ninad Amondikar, Susan Marie Escudier, Sydney Townsend, Holly Books, Ethan Basch

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of ePRO-based symptom management for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Quality of life during electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring in thoracic surgery patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Assessment of patient-reported outcomes as an instrument for patient-centered care?]Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Debra A PattTexas Oncology, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-5185-5170
Amila Meera PatelNavigating Cancer, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-4721-4976
Arun BhardwajNavigating Cancer, Seattle, WA.
Kathryn Elizabeth HudsonTexas Oncology, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-4428
Amanda ChristmanNavigating Cancer, Seattle, WA.
Ninad AmondikarNavigating Cancer, Seattle, WA.
Susan Marie EscudierTexas Oncology, Dallas, TX.
Sydney TownsendTexas Oncology, Dallas, TX.
Holly BooksTexas Oncology, Dallas, TX.
Ethan BaschUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-9318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community oncology practice. We now report step 2 of this study which evaluates the impact of ePROs on outcomes among patients enrolled in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Oncology Care Model (OCM) program.

methodsThis observational study focused on patients with metastatic cancer enrolled in OCM at large community oncology practice located in Texas between July 2020 and December 2020. Patients who completed ≥1 survey via the ePRO tool were included in the study group and were propensity score matched with patients in a control group. Adverse events (AEs; hospitalizations, emergency department visits, deaths) and total cost of care were a priori study outcomes. Mann-Whitney

resultsOf 831 patients with metastatic cancer, 458 matched patients (229/group) were identified, with 52% male and a mean age of 74 years. Mean total AEs were lower in the study group compared with control (0.98

conclusionSymptom monitoring with ePROs improved quality and value of cancer care delivery by reducing hospitalizations, emergency visits, and deaths while lowering cost of care in a large oncology practice.

Indexed as

MedicareNeoplasmsAgedElectronicsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTexasUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37897263
PMCPMC10642897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.