ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024
Differential effects of disulfide bond formation in TEM-1 versus CTX-M-9 β-lactamase.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of synonymous mutations in theMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Conserved proline residues prevent dimerization and aggregation in the β-lactamase BlaC.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Differential effects of disulfide bond formation in TEM-1 versus CTX-M-9 β-lactamase.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate how disulfide bonds can impact protein energy landscapes, we surveyed the effects of adding or removing a disulfide in two β-lactamase enzymes, TEM-1 and CTX-M-9. The homologs share a structure and 38% sequence identity, but only TEM-1 contains a native disulfide bond. They also differ in thermodynamic stability and in the number of states populated at equilibrium: CTX-M-9 is two-state whereas TEM-1 has an additional intermediate state. We hypothesized that the disulfide bond is the major underlying determinant for these observed differences in their energy landscapes. To test this, we removed the disulfide bridge from TEM-1 and introduced a disulfide bridge at the same location in CTX-M-9. This modest change to sequence modulates the stabilities-and therefore populations-of TEM-1's equilibrium states and, more surprisingly, creates a novel third state in CTX-M-9. Unlike TEM-1's partially folded intermediate, this third state is a higher-order oligomer with reduced cysteines that retains the native fold and is fully active. Sub-denaturing concentrations of urea shifts the equilibrium to the monomeric form, allowing the disulfide bond to form. Interestingly, comparing the stability of the oxidized monomer with a variant lacking cysteines reveals the disulfide is neither stabilizing nor destabilizing in CTX-M-9, in contrast with the observed stabilization in TEM-1. Thus, we can conclude that engineering disulfide bonds is not always an effective stabilization strategy even when analogous disulfides exist in more stable structural homologs. This study also illustrates how homo-oligomerization can result from a small number of mutations, suggesting complex formation might be easily accessed during a protein family's evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.