ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets
Bench-to-bedside investigations of H3 K27-altered diffuse midline glioma: drug targets and potential pharmacotherapies.
Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of molecularly targeted therapy-induced immunopeptidome in diffuse midline glioma (DMG).Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- H3K27-Altered Diffuse Midline Glioma of the Brainstem: From Molecular Mechanisms to Targeted Interventions.Cells · 2024Review
- CAR-T cells for H3K27-altered diffuse midline gliomas: where do we stand?Immunotherapy · 2024Article
- Outcomes of H3K27M-altered diffuse midline glioma adult Chinese patients and real-world experience with German-sourced ONC201 targeted therapy: A multi-center study in Hong Kong.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionH3 K27-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is the most common malignant brainstem tumor in the pediatric population. Despite enormous preclinical and clinical efforts, the prognosis remains dismal, with fewer than 10% of patients surviving for two years after diagnosis. Fractionated radiation remains the only standard treatment options for DMG. Developing novel treatments and therapeutic delivery methods is critical to improving outcomes in this devastating disease. AREAS COVERED: This review addresses recent advances in molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy and immunotherapy in DMG. The clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, unique pathological challenges, and current clinical trials are highlighted throughout. EXPERT OPINION: Promising pharmacotherapies targeting various components of DMG pathology and the application of immunotherapies have the potential to improve patient outcomes. However, novel approaches are needed to truly revolutionize treatment for this tumor. First, combinational therapy should be employed, as DMG can develop resistance to single-agent approaches and many therapies are susceptible to rapid clearance from the brain. Second, drug-tumor residence time, i.e. the time for which a therapeutic is present at efficacious concentrations within the tumor, must be maximized to facilitate a durable treatment response. Engineering extended drug delivery methods with minimal off-tumor toxicity should be a focus of future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.