Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37897010›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

The Obstetrician's Role in Pregnant Women's Decision-Making Process Regarding Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccination.

Agnieszka Sienicka, Agata Pisula, Katarzyna Karina Pawlik, Agnieszka Dobrowolska-Redo, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Agnieszka SienickaStudents' Scientific Group Affiliated to 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-315 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2695-7225
Agata PisulaStudents' Scientific Group Affiliated to 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-315 Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Karina PawlikStudents' Scientific Group Affiliated to 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-315 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4342-4324
Agnieszka Dobrowolska-Redo2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-315 Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-315 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2539-3894
Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-315 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1732-9577

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women are considered to be a population vulnerable to influenza and COVID-19 infections, and the latest guidelines consistently recommend that they receive influenza and COVID-19 vaccinations. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among pregnant women in Poland to determine which factors have the greatest impact on their decision to vaccinate against influenza and COVID-19. A total of 515 pregnant women participated in the study. Among them, 38.4% (n = 198) demonstrated a positive attitude toward influenza vaccination, and 64.3% (n = 331) demonstrated a positive attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the strongest influence on positive attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination is having it recommended by an obstetrician-gynecologist (OR = 2.439,

Indexed as

COVID-19influenzaobstetricianpregnancyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID37897010
PMCPMC10610802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.