Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37896992›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Long COVID Prevalence and the Impact of the Third SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Dose: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the Third Follow-Up of the Borriana Cohort, Valencia, Spain (2020-2022).

Salvador Domènech-Montoliu, Joan Puig-Barberà, Gema Badenes-Marques, María Gil-Fortuño, Alejandro Orrico-Sánchez, María Rosario Pac-Sa, Oscar Perez-Olaso, Diego Sala-Trull, Manuel Sánchez-Urbano, Alberto Arnedo-Pena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Bridging Gaps in Long COVID Therapy: A Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long COVID syndrome: An unfolding enigma.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Salvador Domènech-MontoliuEmergency Service, University Hospital de la Plana, 12540 Vila-real, Spain.
Joan Puig-BarberàVaccine Research Unit (AIV), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), 46020 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5783-0409
Gema Badenes-MarquesEmergency Service, University Hospital de la Plana, 12540 Vila-real, Spain.
María Gil-FortuñoMicrobiology Service, University Hospital de la Plana, 12540 Vila-real, Spain.
Alejandro Orrico-SánchezVaccine Research Unit (AIV), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), 46020 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3780-3187
María Rosario Pac-SaCentro de Salud Pública de Castellón, 12003 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
Oscar Perez-OlasoMicrobiology Service, University Hospital de la Plana, 12540 Vila-real, Spain.
Diego Sala-TrullEmergency Service, University Hospital de la Plana, 12540 Vila-real, Spain.
Manuel Sánchez-UrbanoEmergency Service, University Hospital de la Plana, 12540 Vila-real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9629-1601
Alberto Arnedo-PenaCentro de Salud Pública de Castellón, 12003 Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1071-0984
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESUniversidad Publica de Navarra · ES

Funding

Consellería de Sanitat Universal i Salut Pública NAFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn March 2020, a COVID-19 outbreak linked to mass gathering dinners at the Falles Festival in Borriana, Spain, resulted in an estimated attack rate of 42.6% among attendees.

methodsIn June 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional follow-up study of 473 adults aged 18 to 64 who attended the dinners at the Falles Festival in 2020, examining the cumulative experience after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination responses. Data included demographic details, lifestyle habits, medical history, infection records, and vaccinations from a population-based vaccine registry. Blood samples were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and cellular immunity. We employed a doubly robust inverse-probability weighting analysis to estimate the booster vaccine dose's impact on long COVID prevalence and symptom count.

resultsA total of 28.1% of participants met the WHO criteria for long COVID, with older individuals showing higher rates. Long COVID diagnosis was less likely with factors including O blood group, higher occupational status, physical activity, three vaccine doses, strong SARS-CoV-2-S-reactive IFNγ-producing-CD8+ response, and infection during the Omicron period. Increased age, high or low social activity, underlying health conditions, a severe initial COVID episode, and reinfection were associated with higher long COVID likelihood. A booster dose, compared to one or two doses, reduced long COVID risk by 74% (95% CI: 56% to 92%) and symptom count by 55% (95% CI: 32% to 79%).

conclusionLong COVID was prevalent in a significant portion of those who contracted COVID-19, underscoring the need for sustained follow-up and therapeutic strategies. Vaccinations, notably the booster dose, had a substantial beneficial effect on long-term infection outcomes, affirming the vaccination's role in mitigating SARS-CoV-2 infection consequences.

Indexed as

booster dosecellular immunityhumanlong COVIDprevalencerisk factorsSARS-CoV-2 vaccination

Identifiers

PMID37896992
PMCPMC10611325
OpenAlexW4387568814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.