Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37896747›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

GPU Implementation of the Improved CEEMDAN Algorithm for Fast and Efficient EEG Time-Frequency Analysis.

Zeyu Wang, Zoltan Juhasz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zeyu WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, University of Pannonia, 8200 Veszprem, Hungary.
Zoltan JuhaszDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, University of Pannonia, 8200 Veszprem, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-8588

Funding

EU Horizon 101008468National Research, Development and Innovation Office 2019-2.1.11-TÉT-2019-00069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-frequency analysis of EEG data is a key step in exploring the internal activities of the human brain. Studying oscillations is an important part of the analysis, as they are thought to provide the underlying mechanism for communication between neural assemblies. Traditional methods of analysis, such as Short-Time FFT and Wavelet Transforms, are not ideal for this task due to the time-frequency uncertainty principle and their reliance on predefined basis functions. Empirical Mode Decomposition and its variants are more suited to this task as they are able to extract the instantaneous frequency and phase information but are too time consuming for practical use. Our aim was to design and develop a massively parallel and performance-optimized GPU implementation of the Improved Complete Ensemble EMD with the Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN) algorithm that significantly reduces the computational time (from hours to seconds) of such analysis. The resulting GPU program, which is publicly available, was validated against a MATLAB reference implementation and reached over a 260× speedup for actual EEG measurement data, and provided predicted speedups in the range of 3000-8300× for longer measurements when sufficient memory was available. The significance of our research is that this implementation can enable researchers to perform EMD-based EEG analysis routinely, even for high-density EEG measurements. The program is suitable for execution on desktop, cloud, and supercomputer systems and can be the starting point for future large-scale multi-GPU implementations.

Indexed as

CEEMDANEEGEEMDEmpirical Mode DecompositionGPUparallel algorithmperformancetime–frequency analysis

Identifiers

PMID37896747
PMCPMC10611056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.