ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Estimating Patient-Level Uncertainty in Seizure Detection Using Group-Specific Out-of-Distribution Detection Technique.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiscale Cosine Convolution Neural Network for Robust and Interpretable Epileptic EEG Detection.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Domain-generalized Deep Learning for Improved Subject-independent Emotion Recognition Based on Electroencephalography.Experimental neurobiology · 2025Article
- CPRSCA-ResNet: a novel ResNet-based model with Channel-Partitioned Resolution Spatial-Channel Attention for EEG-based seizure detection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder affecting around 1% of the global population, characterized by recurrent epileptic seizures. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for reducing mortality rates. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown potential in aiding clinicians with seizure detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data. However, these algorithms face significant challenges due to the patient-specific variability in seizure patterns and the limited availability of high-quality EEG data for training, causing erratic predictions. These erratic predictions are harmful, especially for high-stake domains in healthcare, negatively affecting patients. Therefore, ensuring safety in AI is of the utmost importance. In this study, we propose a novel ensemble method for uncertainty quantification to identify patients with low-confidence predictions in ML-based seizure detection algorithms. Our approach aims to mitigate high-risk predictions in previously unseen seizure patients, thereby enhancing the robustness of existing seizure detection algorithms. Additionally, our method can be implemented with most of the deep learning (DL) models. We evaluated the proposed method against established uncertainty detection techniques, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying patients for whom the model's predictions are less certain. Our proposed method managed to achieve 87%, 89% and 75% in accuracy, specificity and sensitivity, respectively. This study represents a novel attempt to improve the reliability and robustness of DL algorithms in the domain of seizure detection. This study underscores the value of integrating uncertainty quantification into ML algorithms for seizure detection, offering clinicians a practical tool to gauge the applicability of ML models for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.