Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37895982›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Root Development Monitoring under Different Water Supply Levels in Processing Tomato Plants.

Oussama M'hamdi, Márton Égei, Zoltán Pék, Riadh Ilahy, Eszter Nemeskéri, Lajos Helyes, Sándor Takács

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oussama M'hamdiInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Márton ÉgeiDoctoral School of Plant Science, Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Zoltán PékInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9767-8800
Riadh IlahyLaboratory of Horticulture, National Agricultural Research Institute of Tunisia (INRAT), University of Carthage, Menzah 1, Tunis 1004, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0001-9405-3098
Eszter NemeskériInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Lajos HelyesInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Sándor TakácsInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-7658

Funding

Ministry for Culture and Innovation ÚNKP-22-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing crop yields and optimizing water use is a global challenge, as fresh water supply decreases rapidly and demand remains high. Therefore, understanding how plants react to varying water levels is crucial for efficient water usage. This study evaluates how tomato plants adapt to varying water levels (100%, 50% of crop evapotranspiration, and non-irrigated control) over two growing seasons in 2020 and 2021. Root images were captured weekly during an 8-week monitoring period in 2020 and 6 weeks in 2021 using a non-destructive CI-600 in-situ root imager at depths between 10 and 70 cm. Under water stress, plants developed deeper, more extensive root systems to maximize water uptake, consistent with prior research. Root depth and architecture varied with soil depth and the severity of water stress. Year-to-year variations were also found, likely due to changes in irrigation levels and environmental conditions such as temperature. SPAD values were higher under control conditions, especially in the 2021 growing season, suggesting reduced chlorophyll degradation, while no significant differences were observed in chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) between treatments, suggesting stable photosynthetic efficiency under varied water stress conditions. These findings contribute to our understanding of root zone optimization and drought-resilient cultivar breeding, contributing to more sustainable agricultural practices.

Indexed as

droughtimage analysisnon-destructiveroot monitoringroot scanwater stress

Identifiers

PMID37895982
PMCPMC10609817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.