ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Optimisation of Solid-Phase Extraction and LC-MS/MS Analysis of Six Breast Cancer Drugs in Patient Plasma Samples.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning prediction and calibration of cellulose-based solid-phase extraction performance for pharmaceuticals across aqueous matrices.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Surfactant-enhanced emulsification liquid-liquid microextraction combined with sweeping micellar electrokinetic chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for therapeutic drug monitoring of alpelisib and fulvestrant in human plasma.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Preparation and Application of Sulfamethoxazole-Imprinted Polymer on Solid-Phase Extraction of Pharmaceuticals from Water.Polymers · 2025Article
- Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for the Simultaneous Intracellular Quantification of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib and the EZH2 Inhibitors GSK126 and Tazemetostat.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- High-Throughput Solid Phase Extraction for Targeted and Nontargeted Exposomics.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Fast HPLC Analysis of Three Antitumor Drugs in Pharmaceutical Dosages.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the development of bioanalytical LC-MS methods for the determination of drugs in plasma samples in a clinical setting, adequate sample preparation is of utmost importance. The main goals are to achieve the selective extraction of the analytes of interest and attain thorough matrix removal while retaining acceptable ecological properties, cost-effectiveness, and high throughput. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) offers a versatile range of options, from the selection of an appropriate sorbent to the optimisation of the washing and elution conditions. In this work, the first SPE method for the simultaneous extraction of six anticancer drugs used in novel therapeutic combinations for advanced breast cancer treatment-palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib, anastrozole, letrozole, and fulvestrant-was developed. The following sorbent chemistries were tested: octylsilyl (C8), octadecylsilyl (C18), hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), mixed-mode cation-exchange (MCX and X-C), and mixed-mode weak cation-exchange (WCX), with different corresponding elution solvents. The samples were analysed using LC-MS/MS, with a phenyl column (150 × 4.6 mm, 2.5 μm). The best extraction recoveries (≥92.3%) of all analytes were obtained with the C8 phase, using methanol as the elution solvent. The optimised method was validated in the clinically relevant ranges, showing adequate precision (inter-day RSD ≤ 14.3%) and accuracy (inter-day bias -12.7-13.5%). Finally, its applicability was successfully proven by the analysis of samples from breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.