ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Enhancing Breast Cancer Detection and Classification Using Advanced Multi-Model Features and Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast cancer detection and classification via a robust deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of a machine-learning based diagnosis procedure to distinguish aortic dissection from non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A Novel Hybrid CNN-ViT-Based Bi-Directional Cross-Guidance Fusion-Driven Breast Cancer Detection Model.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- New hybrid features extracted from US images for breast cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced and Interpretable Prediction of Multiple Cancer Types Using a Stacking Ensemble Approach with SHAP Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning approaches for diagnosing seizure based on EEG signal analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Divulging Patterns: An Analytical Review for Machine Learning Methodologies for Breast Cancer Detection.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- XAI-driven CatBoost multi-layer perceptron neural network for analyzing breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Novel Information Complexity Approach to Score Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Modeling.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Nuclear Features from the Fine Needle Aspirated (FNA) Tissue Samples to Recognize Breast Cancer.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Rapid detection of liver metastasis risk in colorectal cancer patients through blood test indicators.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women, making it essential to have an accurate and dependable system for diagnosing benign or malignant tumors. It is essential to detect this cancer early in order to inform subsequent treatments. Currently, fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology and machine learning (ML) models can be used to detect and diagnose this cancer more accurately. Consequently, an effective and dependable approach needs to be developed to enhance the clinical capacity to diagnose this illness. This study aims to detect and divide BC into two categories using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) benchmark feature set and to select the fewest features to attain the highest accuracy. To this end, this study explores automated BC prediction using multi-model features and ensemble machine learning (EML) techniques. To achieve this, we propose an advanced ensemble technique, which incorporates voting, bagging, stacking, and boosting as combination techniques for the classifier in the proposed EML methods to distinguish benign breast tumors from malignant cancers. In the feature extraction process, we suggest a recursive feature elimination technique to find the most important features of the WDBC that are pertinent to BC detection and classification. Furthermore, we conducted cross-validation experiments, and the comparative results demonstrated that our method can effectively enhance classification performance and attain the highest value in six evaluation metrics, including precision, sensitivity, area under the curve (AUC), specificity, accuracy, and F1-score. Overall, the stacking model achieved the best average accuracy, at 99.89%, and its sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, precision, and AUC/ROC were 1.00%, 0.999%, 1.00%, 1.00%, and 1.00%, respectively, thus generating excellent results. The findings of this study can be used to establish a reliable clinical detection system, enabling experts to make more precise and operative decisions in the future. Additionally, the proposed technology might be used to detect a variety of cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.