ArticleGenes2023
Predictive Clinical and Biological Criteria for Gene Panel Positivity in Suspected Inherited Autoinflammatory Diseases: Insights from a Case-Control Study.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to assess the clinical and biological criteria that predict gene panel positivity in patients with a suspected inherited genetic autoinflammatory disease, we conducted a case-control study. These new selection criteria could replace the national multidisciplinary staff approval before performing genetic testing that has been required since 2019. The study involved 119 positive gene panels matched by panel sizes to 119 randomly selected negative gene panels. The patients were referred to our laboratory for genetic testing between June 2012, and March 2023. The clinical and biological criteria were extracted from a prospectively filled database. We focused our evaluation on accuracy and the positive predictive value. Neonatal symptom onset and deafness had the highest accuracies among all criteria associated with the positivity panel, with 92.9% (88.6; 96.0) and 92.6% (88.5; 95.6), respectively. However, it is important to note that the associated Positive Predictive Values (PPVs) cannot exceed 50%. Despite finding a statistical association between clinical and biological criteria and panel positivity, the predictive values of these criteria were not sufficient to recommend Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) gene panel testing without the national multidisciplinary staff evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.