Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37895217›Full record

ArticleGenes2023

Comparative Benchmarking of Optical Genome Mapping and Chromosomal Microarray Reveals High Technological Concordance in CNV Identification and Additional Structural Variant Refinement.

Hayk Barseghyan, Andy Wing Chun Pang, Benjamin Clifford, Moises A Serrano, Alka Chaubey, Alex R Hastie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Narrative Review: Update on the Molecular Diagnosis of Fragile X Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hayk BarseghyanBionano, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0507-2532
Andy Wing Chun PangBionano, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Benjamin CliffordBionano, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Moises A SerranoBionano Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT 84109, USA.
Alka ChaubeyBionano, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0914-9237
Alex R HastieBionano, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5829-2649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recommended practice for individuals suspected of a genetic etiology for disorders including unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) involves a genetic testing workflow including chromosomal microarray (CMA), Fragile-X testing, karyotype analysis, and/or sequencing-based gene panels. Since genomic imbalances are often found to be causative, CMA is recommended as first tier testing for many indications. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is an emerging next generation cytogenomic technique that can detect not only copy number variants (CNVs), triploidy and absence of heterozygosity (AOH) like CMA, but can also define the location of duplications, and detect other structural variants (SVs), including balanced rearrangements and repeat expansions/contractions. This study compares OGM to CMA for clinically reported genomic variants, some of these samples also have structural characterization by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). OGM was performed on IRB approved, de-identified specimens from 55 individuals with genomic abnormalities previously identified by CMA (61 clinically reported abnormalities). SVs identified by OGM were filtered by a control database to remove polymorphic variants and against an established gene list to prioritize clinically relevant findings before comparing with CMA and FISH results. OGM results showed 100% concordance with CMA findings for pathogenic variants and 98% concordant for all pathogenic/likely pathogenic/variants of uncertain significance (VUS), while also providing additional insight into the genomic structure of abnormalities that CMA was unable to provide. OGM demonstrates equivalent performance to CMA for CNV and AOH detection, enhanced by its ability to determine the structure of the genome. This work adds to an increasing body of evidence on the analytical validity and ability to detect clinically relevant abnormalities identified by CMA. Moreover, OGM identifies translocations, structures of duplications and complex CNVs intractable by CMA, yielding additional clinical utility.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDevelopmental DisabilitiesChildChromosome MappingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypeabsence of heterozygosityaneuploidyAOHchromosomal microarrayCMACNVsOGMoptical genome mappingSaphyrSVstriploidy

Identifiers

PMID37895217
PMCPMC10667989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.