ArticleGenes2023
Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Curating Genetic Associations With Rheumatologic Autoimmune Diseases to Improve Patient Outcomes.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Eye Disease in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic testing may provide information for diagnostic, prognostic and pharmacogenetic purposes. The PREPARE study recently showed that the number of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions could be reduced via genotype-guided treatment. The aim of this work was to assess the relevance of genetic testing and its actual use in consecutive rheumatic outpatients.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed with data from a prospectively designed observational project with outpatients consecutively recruited from a university clinic of rheumatology.
resultsIn this cohort of 2490 patients, the potential need for genetic testing is immense, with 57.3% of patients having the potential to benefit from genetic testing according to their diagnosis and treatment and 53.3% of patients with actually performed genetic testing for diagnostic, prognostic or pharmacogenetic purposes. In detail, patients would potentially benefit from genetic testing especially for therapeutic (28.0%) and diagnostic (26.9%) purposes. Genetic testing was performed for diagnostic purposes in 51.6% of subjects, for pharmacogenetic purposes in 3.7% and for prognostic purposes in 0.1%. The ratio between the number of patients who had had tests performed to those with a potential need for genetic testing decreased with age, from 127.1% for 20 to <30-year-old patients to 46.1% for 80 to <90-year-old patients. Pharmacogenetic testing was only performed for disease-related medications.
conclusionsGenetic testing is frequently needed in patients with rheumatic diseases. The value of pharmacogenetic testing is certainly underestimated, especially in case of medications for comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.