Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37894518›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Hydrogel Tissue Bioengineered Scaffolds in Bone Repair: A Review.

Qiteng Ding, Shuai Zhang, Xinglong Liu, Yingchun Zhao, Jiali Yang, Guodong Chai, Ning Wang, Shuang Ma, Wencong Liu, Chuanbo Ding

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qiteng DingCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Shuai ZhangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Xinglong LiuCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jilin Agriculture Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China.
Yingchun ZhaoMedical Science and Technology Innovation Center, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China.
Jiali YangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Guodong ChaiCollege of Resources and Environment, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Ning WangCollege of Resources and Environment, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Shuang MaCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Wencong LiuSchool of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Wuzhou University, Wuzhou 543002, China.
Chuanbo DingCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jilin Agriculture Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China.
Jilin Agricultural University · CNJilin Agricultural Science and Technology University · CNShandong First Medical University · CNWuzhou University · CN

Funding

Jilin Province Science and Technology Department 20220508062RC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large bone defects due to trauma, infections, and tumors are difficult to heal spontaneously by the body's repair mechanisms and have become a major hindrance to people's daily lives and economic development. However, autologous and allogeneic bone grafts, with their lack of donors, more invasive surgery, immune rejection, and potential viral transmission, hinder the development of bone repair. Hydrogel tissue bioengineered scaffolds have gained widespread attention in the field of bone repair due to their good biocompatibility and three-dimensional network structure that facilitates cell adhesion and proliferation. In addition, loading natural products with nanoparticles and incorporating them into hydrogel tissue bioengineered scaffolds is one of the most effective strategies to promote bone repair due to the good bioactivity and limitations of natural products. Therefore, this paper presents a brief review of the application of hydrogels with different gel-forming properties, hydrogels with different matrices, and nanoparticle-loaded natural products loaded and incorporated into hydrogels for bone defect repair in recent years.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsHydrogelsBiomedical EngineeringHumansTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiological ProductsHydrogelsbone repairhydrogelnanoparticlestissue bioengineered scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID37894518
PMCPMC10609504
OpenAlexW4387576294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.