Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37894276›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Applying Natural Language Processing to Single-Report Prediction of Metastatic Disease Response Using the OR-RADS Lexicon.

Lydia Elbatarny, Richard K G Do, Natalie Gangai, Firas Ahmed, Shalini Chhabra, Amber L Simpson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lydia ElbatarnySchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 2N8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2492-2619
Richard K G DoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6554-0310
Natalie GangaiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0603-7165
Firas AhmedDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Shalini ChhabraDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Amber L SimpsonSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 2N8, Canada.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USQueen's University · CA

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Development and Validation of Prognostic Radiomic Markers of Response and Recurrence for Patients with Colorectal Liver MetastasesR01CA233888 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHUN, YUN SHIN, DO, RICHARD KINH GIAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generating Real World Evidence (RWE) on disease responses from radiological reports is important for understanding cancer treatment effectiveness and developing personalized treatment. A lack of standardization in reporting among radiologists impacts the feasibility of large-scale interpretation of disease response. This study examines the utility of applying natural language processing (NLP) to the large-scale interpretation of disease responses using a standardized oncologic response lexicon (OR-RADS) to facilitate RWE collection. Radiologists annotated 3503 retrospectively collected clinical impressions from radiological reports across several cancer types with one of seven OR-RADS categories. A Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model was trained on this dataset with an 80-20% train/test split to perform multiclass and single-class classification tasks using the OR-RADS. Radiologists also performed the classification to compare human and model performance. The model achieved accuracies from 95 to 99% across all classification tasks, performing better in single-class tasks compared to the multiclass task and producing minimal misclassifications, which pertained mostly to overpredicting the equivocal and mixed OR-RADS labels. Human accuracy ranged from 74 to 93% across all classification tasks, performing better on single-class tasks. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the BERT NLP model in predicting disease response in cancer patients, exceeding human performance, and encourages the use of the standardized OR-RADS lexicon to improve large-scale prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

computed tomographydisease progressionmetastasisnatural language processingradiology

Identifiers

PMID37894276
PMCPMC10605614
OpenAlexW4387500628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.