Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37894228›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Cultivating Resilience in Dryland Soils: An Assisted Migration Approach to Biological Soil Crust Restoration.

Sierra D Jech, Natalie Day, Nichole N Barger, Anita Antoninka, Matthew A Bowker, Sasha Reed, Colin Tucker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing the implementation of crustivoltaics inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sierra D JechDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8852-0665
Natalie DayColorado Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Grand Junction, CO 81506, USA.
Nichole N BargerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Anita AntoninkaSchool of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-9892
Matthew A BowkerSchool of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
Sasha ReedSouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Moab, UT 84532, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-8619
Colin TuckerManti-La Sal National Forest, U.S. Forest Service, Monticello, UT 84535, USA.
Northern Arizona University · USUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUS Forest Service · US

Funding

Canyonlands Research Center NADepartment of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program RC18-1322Wildlife Conservation Society Climate Adaptation Fund NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land use practices and climate change have driven substantial soil degradation across global drylands, impacting ecosystem functions and human livelihoods. Biological soil crusts, a common feature of dryland ecosystems, are under extensive exploration for their potential to restore the stability and fertility of degraded soils through the development of inoculants. However, stressful abiotic conditions often result in the failure of inoculation-based restoration in the field and may hinder the long-term success of biocrust restoration efforts. Taking an assisted migration approach, we cultivated biocrust inocula sourced from multiple hot-adapted sites (Mojave and Sonoran Deserts) in an outdoor facility at a cool desert site (Colorado Plateau). In addition to cultivating inoculum from each site, we created an inoculum mixture of biocrust from the Mojave Desert, Sonoran Desert, and Colorado Plateau. We then applied two habitat amelioration treatments to the cultivation site (growth substrate and shading) to enhance soil stability and water availability and reduce UV stress. Using marker gene sequencing, we found that the cultivated mixed inoculum comprised both local- and hot-adapted cyanobacteria at the end of cultivation but had similar cyanobacterial richness as each unmixed inoculum. All cultivated inocula had more cyanobacterial 16S rRNA gene copies and higher cyanobacterial richness when cultivated with a growth substrate and shade. Our work shows that it is possible to field cultivate biocrust inocula sourced from different deserts, but that community composition shifts toward that of the cultivation site unless habitat amelioration is employed. Future assessments of the function of a mixed inoculum in restoration and its resilience in the face of abiotic stressors are needed to determine the relative benefit of assisted migration compared to the challenges and risks of this approach.

Indexed as

assisted migrationbiological soil crustclimate changecyanobacteriamicrobial ecologyrestorationsoil degradation

Identifiers

PMID37894228
PMCPMC10608944
OpenAlexW4387653605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.