Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37893981›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Modelling of Animal Activity, Illuminance, and Noise on a Weaned Piglet Farm.

Maria D Fernández, Roberto Besteiro, Tamara Arango, Manuel R Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria D FernándezBioMODEM Research Group, Higher Polytechnic Engineering School, Terra Campus, University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-7620
Roberto BesteiroAnimal Production Department, Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo, AGACAL, 15318 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6681-5446
Tamara ArangoJuana de Vega Foundation, 15176 A Coruña, Spain.
Manuel R RodríguezBioMODEM Research Group, Higher Polytechnic Engineering School, Terra Campus, University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1516-7869

Funding

Xunta de Galicia ED431B 2021/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring animal activity and its evolution in real time is useful for animal welfare assessment. In addition, illuminance and noise level are two factors that can improve our understanding of animal activity. This study aims to establish relationships between animal activity as measured by passive infrared sensors, and both illuminance and noise level on a conventional weaned piglet farm. First, regression models were applied, and then cosine models with three harmonics were developed using least squares with a Generalized Reduced Gradient Nonlinear method. Finally, all the models were validated. Linear models showed positive correlations, with values between 0.40 and 0.56. Cosine models drew clear patterns of daily animal activity, illuminance and noise level with two peaks, one in the morning and one in the afternoon, coinciding with human activity inside the building, with a preference for inactivity at night-time and around midday. Cosine model fitting revealed strong correlations, both in the measurement and validation periods, for animal activity (R = 0.97 and 0.92), illuminance (R = 0.95 and 0.91) and noise level (R = 0.99 and 0.92). The developed models could be easily implemented in animal welfare monitoring systems and could provide useful information about animal activity through continuous monitoring of illuminance or noise levels.

Indexed as

animal activitycosine modelfarmilluminancenoise levelpig

Identifiers

PMID37893981
PMCPMC10603669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.