Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37893899›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Bridging Evolutionary History and Conservation of New World Vultures.

Daniela Cortés-Díaz, Diana L Buitrago-Torres, Juan Sebastián Restrepo-Cardona, Irene Estellés-Domingo, Pascual López-López

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniela Cortés-DíazSemillero de Investigación en Ecología y Conservación, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá 110151, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-5547
Diana L Buitrago-TorresPrograma de Biología, Universidad del Quindío, Carrera 15 #12N, Quindío 630004, Colombia.
Juan Sebastián Restrepo-CardonaWildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-201X
Irene Estellés-DomingoMovement Ecology Laboratory, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Pascual López-LópezMovement Ecology Laboratory, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5269-652X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The New World Vultures (Cathartidae) include seven species of obligate scavengers that, despite their ecological relevance, present critical information gaps around their evolutionary history and conservation. Insights into their phylogenetic relationships in recent years has enabled the addressing of such information gaps through approaches based on phylogeny. We reconstructed the ancestral area in America of the current species using two regionalization schemes and methods: Biogeography with Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis (BioGeoBears) and Bayesian Binary Model-Monte Carlo Markov Chains (BBM-MCMC). Then, we identified the priority species and areas for conservation by means of the Evolutionary Distinctiveness index (ED), as a proxy of the uniqueness of species according to phylogeny, and the Global Endangerment index (GE), mapping phylogenetic diversity. We found that the ancestral area of New World Vultures in America corresponds to South America, with dispersal processes that led to a recolonization of North America by

Indexed as

biogeographyCathartidaeEDGEevolutionary distinctivenessextinctionforaging strategiesphylogenetic comparative methodsraptors

Identifiers

PMID37893899
PMCPMC10603630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.