Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37893884›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Emotional Contagion and Social Support in Pigs with the Negative Stimulus.

Ye Zhang, Jiaqi Yu, Yu Zhang, Yaqian Zhang, Fang Sun, Yuhan Yao, Ziyu Bai, Hanqing Sun, Qian Zhao, Xiang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ye ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4819-4409
Jiaqi YuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.
Yu ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.
Yaqian ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.
Fang SunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.
Yuhan YaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.
Ziyu BaiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.
Hanqing SunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.
Qian ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.
Xiang LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road No. 600, Harbin 150030, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8944-086X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32272927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study expects to confirm the existence of emotional transmission in pigs from multiple perspectives and to provide theoretical references for improving animal welfare in livestock farming. A group that could directly observe (DO) and a group that could not directly observe (NO) were created based on whether or not their peers observed the treatment process, as the treated pig (TP) was treated with electrical shock and the companion pig (CP) either witnessed the treatment inflicted upon TP or not, and a third group was a control group, in which neither pig was stimulated. The behavioral responses of both the TPs and CPs were recorded to evaluate the emotional reaction. The results found that in both the DO and NO groups, the frequency of TP freezing was significantly higher than that of CP, and CP was significantly higher than that of the control group. Interestingly, although the social interaction responses of the CPs were not similar in the DO and NO groups, there were no significant differences between the behaviors of TPs in the DO and NO groups, except for nose-nose contact and a single approach to the partition, which allowed us to conclude that, whether or not the pigs directly observed the negative treatment, they were able to respond accordingly to fear and provide similar social support to their companions who were treated negatively.

Indexed as

emotional contagionempathynegative stimuluspigsocial support

Identifiers

PMID37893884
PMCPMC10603741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.