Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37893858›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Perceptions and Attitudes of Mental Health Professionals toward the Mental Health Care Law in Saudi Arabia.

Ahmad H Almadani, Eylaf S Altheyab, Meshal A Alkheraiji, Abdulaziz F Alfraiji, Fatimah Albrekkan, AlRabab S Alkhamis, Fay H AlBuqami, Mohammed A Aljaffer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad H AlmadaniDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4490-3220
Eylaf S AltheyabDepartment of Psychiatry, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-0901
Meshal A AlkheraijiDepartment of Psychiatry, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0000-6384-0726
Abdulaziz F AlfraijiDepartment of Psychiatry, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5405-5045
Fatimah AlbrekkanDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7007-3307
AlRabab S AlkhamisDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0001-8498-9703
Fay H AlBuqamiCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0009-7119-0271
Mohammed A AljafferDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0345-5567
King Saud Medical City · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs; SABIC Psychological Health Research and Applications Chair (SPHRAC), Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine,
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Saudi Mental Health Care Law (SMHL) was established in 2014; however, no prior study has evaluated mental health professionals' perceptions or attitudes toward it. This cross-sectional study examines these aspects and their associated factors among psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and psychiatric nurses in Saudi Arabia (SA). The data were collected from 432 participants using an online electronic survey consisting of four sections, including the Mental Health Legislation Attitudes Scale (MHLAS). Psychiatrists comprised most participants (46.06%), followed by psychologists (36.34%). Most participants were 40 years of age or younger (83.10%). Of the 432 participants, 226 (52.31%) were females. Overall, 28.70% were unaware of the existence of the SMHL. A total of 172 (66.67%) out of 258 participants agreed that the legislation operates well in ensuring treatment for persons who require involuntary admission. There was a statistically significant association between specialty and opinions of treatment efficacy and care benefits of the SMHL (

Indexed as

Mental Health ActMental Health Legislation Attitudes Scalemental health professionalsSaudi ArabiaSaudi Mental Health Care Law

Identifiers

PMID37893858
PMCPMC10606621
OpenAlexW4387847436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.