Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37893856›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Resources and Obstacles of a Maternity Staff Facing Intimate Partner Violence during Pregnancy-A Qualitative Study.

Yam Sureau, Marie-Rose Moro, Rahmeth Radjack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yam SureauAPHP, Hôpital Cochin, Maison de Solenn, 75014 Paris, France.
Marie-Rose MoroAPHP, Hôpital Cochin, Maison de Solenn, 75014 Paris, France.
Rahmeth RadjackAPHP, Hôpital Cochin, Maison de Solenn, 75014 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-1078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntimate partner violence occurring during pregnancy has a similar prevalence as usual obstetrical disorders that are routinely screened for. Referenced publications insist on the importance of adequate screening, but the proper course of action has yet to be defined. AIM OF STUDY: We qualitatively explored the different resources and concepts that emerge from the discourse of maternity staff across professions. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe led a semi structured interview with professionals, which included following their involvement with preselected patients. Nine professionals provided a sample of 19 interviews. The data was analysed using IPA methodology. Results We highlight the investigative importance of navigating the patient's initial demand or lack thereof and the baby's importance within, while identifying mechanisms of maternal disqualification. Creating an atmosphere prone to patient empowerment was the final theme to emerge from the study as the most beneficial tactic both in the short and long term.

conclusionsHCPs need to enable patients' trust on a personal and an institutional level, as well as empowering the patient in the moment and respecting their values and choices. HCPs also convey the stability of the institution that has become a reference of refuge and assistance for patients from their pregnancy onwards.

Indexed as

assessmentdomestic abuseempowermentgestational intimate partner violence (GIPV)healthcare professionals (HCPs)intimate partner violence (IPV)pregnancyteam supporttrauma

Identifiers

PMID37893856
PMCPMC10606075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.