Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37893732›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Development of Seven New dPCR Animal Species Assays and a Reference Material to Support Quantitative Ratio Measurements of Food and Feed Products.

Kate R Griffiths, Jacob L H McLaughlin, Felicity Hall, Lina Partis, Samuel C Hansen, Rachel Tulloch, Daniel G Burke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kate R GriffithsBioanalysis Section, National Measurement Institute, Lindfield, Sydney, NSW 2070, Australia.
Jacob L H McLaughlinBioanalysis Section, National Measurement Institute, Lindfield, Sydney, NSW 2070, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9995-1508
Felicity HallBioanalysis Section, National Measurement Institute, Lindfield, Sydney, NSW 2070, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1382-1257
Lina PartisBioanalysis Section, National Measurement Institute, Lindfield, Sydney, NSW 2070, Australia.
Samuel C HansenBioanalysis Section, National Measurement Institute, Lindfield, Sydney, NSW 2070, Australia.
Rachel TullochBioanalysis Section, National Measurement Institute, Lindfield, Sydney, NSW 2070, Australia.
Daniel G BurkeBioanalysis Section, National Measurement Institute, Lindfield, Sydney, NSW 2070, Australia.
National Measurement Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory testing methods to confirm the identity of meat products and eliminate food fraud regularly rely on PCR amplification of extracted DNA, with most published assays detecting mitochondrial sequences, providing sensitive presence/absence results. By targeting single-copy nuclear targets instead, relative quantification measurements are achievable, providing additional information on the proportions of meat species detected. In this Methods paper, new assays for horse, donkey, duck, kangaroo, camel, water buffalo and crocodile have been developed to expand the range of species that can be quantified, and a previously published reference assay targeting the myostatin gene has been modified to include marsupials and reptiles. The accuracy of this ratio measurement approach was demonstrated using dPCR with mixtures of meat DNA down to 0.1%. However, the limit of detection (LOD) of this approach is not just determined by the assay targets, but by the samples themselves, with food or feed ingredients and processing impacting the DNA yield and integrity. In routine testing settings, the myostatin assay can provide multiple quality control roles, including monitoring the yield and purity of extracted DNA, identifying the presence of additional meats not detected by the suite of species-specific assays and potentially estimating a sample-specific LOD based on measured copy numbers of the myostatin target. In addition to the myostatin positive control assay, a synthetic DNA reference material (RM) has been designed, containing PCR targets for beef, pork, sheep, chicken, goat, kangaroo, horse, water buffalo and myostatin, to be used as a positive template control. The availability of standardised measurement methods and associated RMs significantly improves the reliability, comparability and transparency of laboratory testing, leading to greater confidence in results.

Indexed as

animal speciesdPCRduplex digital PCRfood fraudmeat and bone mealpetfoodratio measurementssynthetic reference materials

Identifiers

PMID37893732
PMCPMC10606771
OpenAlexW4387809901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.