Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37893679›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effects of Diets Combining Peanut Vine and Whole-Plant Corn Silage on Growth Performance, Meat Quality and Rumen Microbiota of Simmental Crossbred Cattle.

Jixiang Ma, Hua Liu, Mengqi Liu, Junying Xu, Jiading Lu, Shixi Cao, Shouren Li, Sen Ma, Zhichang Wang, Xiaoyan Zhu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Replacing Alfalfa withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of DifferentMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jixiang MaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Hua LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Mengqi LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Junying XuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Jiading LuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Shixi CaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Shouren LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Sen MaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-0858
Zhichang WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Xiaoyan ZhuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Defeng LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Hao SunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Yinghua ShiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Yalei CuiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation No. 2022M710046Henan Postdoctoral Science Foundation Henan Postdoctoral Science FoundationHenan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project No.222102110007Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China CARS-34Science and Technology Innovation Team of Henan Province High Quality Forage and Animal Health No.22IRTSTHN022the Outstanding Talents of Henan Agricultural University No.30500636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peanut vine is a typical peanut by-product and can be used as a quality roughage resource. Whole-plant corn silage is a commonly used roughage. However, few studies have investigated the effects of diets combining peanut vine and whole-plant corn silage on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, meat quality, rumen fermentation and microbiota of beef cattle. To investigate these effects, eighty Simmental crossbred cattle (body weight, 451.27 ± 10.38 kg) approximately 14 months old were randomly divided into four treatments for a 90-day feeding experiment. A one-way design method was used in this experiment. According to the roughage composition, the cattle were divided into a control treatment of 45% wheat straw and 55% whole-plant corn silage (WG), and three treatments of 25% peanut vine and 75% whole-plant corn silage (LPG), 45% peanut vine and 55% whole-plant corn silage (MPG), and 65% peanut vine and 35% whole-plant corn silage (HPG), and the concentrate was the same for all four treatment diets. The results showed that compared to the WG group, the MPG group experienced an increase in their average daily feed intake of 14%, an average daily gain of 32%, and an increase in SOD activity in the spleen of 33%; in the meat, dry matter content increased by 11%, crude protein by 9%, and ether extract content by 40%; in the rumen, the NH

Indexed as

antioxidant capacitybeef cattleroughagerumen fermentation

Identifiers

PMID37893679
PMCPMC10606686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.