ArticleMicromachines2023
Performance and Quality Comparison of Movie Alignment Software for Cryogenic Electron Microscopy.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An unattended image-processing pipeline for on-the-fly quality assessment and 3D exploration in cryo-EM.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Coming Clean and Avoiding Bubble Trouble-Using Detergents Wisely in the Purification of Membrane Proteins for Cryo-EM Studies.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Birds of a feather flock together: structural characterization of red-crowned crane and turkey aveparvoviruses.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Cryo-Electron Microscopy Studies of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Performance and Quality Comparison of Movie Alignment Software for Cryogenic Electron Microscopy.Micromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryogenic electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) has been established as one of the key players in structural biology. It can reconstruct a 3D model of a sample at a near-atomic resolution. With the increasing number of facilities, faster microscopes, and new imaging techniques, there is a growing demand for algorithms and programs able to process the so-called movie data produced by the microscopes in real time while preserving a high resolution and maximal information. In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of the quality and performance of the most commonly used software for movie alignment. More precisely, we compare the most recent versions of FlexAlign (Xmipp v3.23.03), MotionCor2 (v1.6.4), Relion MotionCor (v4.0-beta), Warp (v1.0.9), and CryoSPARC (v4.0.3). We tested the quality of the alignment using generated phantom data, as well as real datasets, comparing the alignment precision, power spectra density, and performance scaling of each program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.