ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Evaluation of the Photoplethysmogram-Based Deep Learning Model for Continuous Respiratory Rate Estimation in Surgical Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A late fusion multi-task learning for respiratory waveform and rate estimation from photoplethysmography.PloS one · 2026Article
- Special Issue: "Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Signal Processing".Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The respiratory rate (RR) is a significant indicator to evaluate a patient's prognosis and status; however, it requires specific instrumentation or estimates from other monitored signals. A photoplethysmogram (PPG) is extensively used in clinical environments as well as in intensive care units (ICUs) to primarily monitor peripheral circulation while capturing indirect information about intrathoracic pressure changes. This study aims to apply and evaluate several deep learning models using a PPG for the continuous and accurate estimation of the RRs of patients. The dataset was collected twice for 2 min each in 100 patients aged 18 years and older from the surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary referral hospital. The BIDMC and CapnoBase public datasets were also analyzed. The collected dataset was preprocessed and split according to the 5-fold cross-validation. We used seven deep learning models, including our own Dilated Residual Neural Network, to check how accurately the RR estimates match the ground truth using the mean absolute error (MAE). As a result, when validated using the collected dataset, our model showed the best results with a 1.2628 ± 0.2697 MAE on BIDMC and RespNet and with a 3.1268 ± 0.6363 MAE on our dataset, respectively. In conclusion, RR estimation using PPG-derived models is still challenging and has many limitations. However, if there is an equal amount of data from various breathing groups to train, we expect that various models, including our Dilated ResNet model, which showed good results, can achieve better results than the current ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.