Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37892839›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Scoping Meta-Review of Methods Used to Assess Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices for Heart Failure.

Rossella Di Bidino, Davide Piaggio, Martina Andellini, Beatriz Merino-Barbancho, Laura Lopez-Perez, Tianhui Zhu, Zeeshan Raza, Melody Ni, Andra Morrison, Simone Borsci and 3 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Health technology assessment framework for artificial intelligence-based technologies.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rossella Di BidinoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS-The Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (ALTEMS), 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-856X
Davide PiaggioSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5408-9360
Martina AndelliniSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2931-0753
Beatriz Merino-BarbanchoLife Supporting Technologies, Photonics Technology and Bioengineering Department, School of Telecommunication Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5070-4178
Laura Lopez-PerezLife Supporting Technologies, Photonics Technology and Bioengineering Department, School of Telecommunication Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1536-1090
Tianhui ZhuNIHR London In-Vitro Diagnostics Cooperative, Imperial College of London, London W2 1NY, UK.
Zeeshan RazaSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Melody NiNIHR London In-Vitro Diagnostics Cooperative, Imperial College of London, London W2 1NY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7356-848X
Andra MorrisonCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8, Canada.
Simone BorsciNIHR London In-Vitro Diagnostics Cooperative, Imperial College of London, London W2 1NY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3591-3577
Giuseppe FicoLife Supporting Technologies, Photonics Technology and Bioengineering Department, School of Telecommunication Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1551-4613
Leandro PecchiaSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7900-5415
Ernesto IadanzaInternational Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7291-4990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) are playing increasingly important roles, permeating the field of medical devices (MDs). This rapid progress has not yet been matched by the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process, which still needs to define a common methodology for assessing AI/ML-based MDs. To collect existing evidence from the literature about the methods used to assess AI-based MDs, with a specific focus on those used for the management of heart failure (HF), the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE) conducted a scoping meta-review. This manuscript presents the results of this search, which covered the period from January 1974 to October 2022. After careful independent screening, 21 reviews, mainly conducted in North America and Europe, were retained and included. Among the findings were that deep learning is the most commonly utilised method and that electronic health records and registries are among the most prevalent sources of data for AI/ML algorithms. Out of the 21 included reviews, 19 focused on risk prediction and/or the early diagnosis of HF. Furthermore, 10 reviews provided evidence of the impact on the incidence/progression of HF, and 13 on the length of stay. From an HTA perspective, the main areas requiring improvement are the quality assessment of studies on AI/ML (included in 11 out of 21 reviews) and their data sources, as well as the definition of the criteria used to assess the selection of the most appropriate AI/ML algorithm.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedecision makinghealth technology assessmentheart failuremachine learningscoping reviewvalue assessment

Identifiers

PMID37892839
PMCPMC10604154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.