Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37892827›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update on the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib.

Robert Harrington, Patricia Harkins, Richard Conway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Antibiotics for Rheumatologic Diseases: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert HarringtonDepartment of Rheumatology, St. James's Hospital, James Street, Dublin 8, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
Patricia HarkinsDepartment of Rheumatology, St. James's Hospital, James Street, Dublin 8, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7769-6454
Richard ConwayDepartment of Rheumatology, St. James's Hospital, James Street, Dublin 8, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-3362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are the most recent new drug class to arrive to the market for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. While they have proven to be a very effective treatment option, there remains significant concern regarding the risk of cardiovascular events, thrombosis and malignancy, particularly given the findings of the post-marketing ORAL Surveillance study and FDA black box warnings. This article reviews the key findings of the most impactful cohort of studies and registry data since ORAL Surveillance. It also evaluates the role of JAKis in practice and offers guidance on risk stratifying patients and determining their suitability for a JAKi.

Indexed as

efficacyJAKiJAK inhibitorJanus kinase inhibitiorMACEmalignancyORAL surveillanceRArheumatoid arthritissafetythromboembolismVTE

Identifiers

PMID37892827
PMCPMC10607454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.