ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Correlation Analysis of Nasal Septum Deviation and Results of AI-Driven Automated 3D Cephalometric Analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nasal Septal Deviation Classifications, Including the Mladina System, and Their Craniofacial Correlates: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association Between Anatomical Nasal Obstruction and Maxillary Constriction: Study on Postero-Anterior Cephalograms.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A YOLOv12-based approach for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on 2D lateral skull X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reliability of AI-driven cephalometric analysis on CBCT: comparison with manual 2D cephalometry.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- CBCT-Based Orthodontic Classification Using Commercial AI: Completeness and Accuracy in Independent Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- FDA-Approved AI Solutions in Dental Imaging: A Narrative Review of Applications, Evidence, and Outlook.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontics: a narrative review.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Review
- Assessment of the prevalence of nasal deviation in patients requiring orthognathic surgery: association with maxillary, mandibular, or chin asymmetry.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Comparison of AI-assisted cephalometric analysis and orthodontist-performed digital tracing analysis.Progress in orthodontics · 2024Article
- Comparison of Three Commercially Available, AI-Driven Cephalometric Analysis Tools in Orthodontics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Reliability of the AI-Assisted Assessment of the Proximity of the Root Apices to Mandibular Canal.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Skeletal facial asymmetry: reliability of manual and artificial intelligence-driven analysis.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nasal septum is believed to play a crucial role in the development of the craniofacial skeleton. Nasal septum deviation (NSD) is a common condition, affecting 18-65% of individuals. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of NSD and its potential association with abnormalities detected through cephalometric analysis using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. The study included CT scans of 120 consecutive, post-traumatic patients aged 18-30. Cephalometric analysis was performed using an AI web-based software, CephX. The automatic analysis comprised all the available cephalometric analyses. NSD was assessed using two methods: maximum deviation from an ideal non-deviated septum and septal deviation angle (SDA). The concordance of repeated manual measurements and automatic analyses was assessed. Of the 120 cases, 90 met the inclusion criteria. The AI-based cephalometric analysis provided comprehensive reports with over 100 measurements. Only the hinge axis angle (HAA) and SDA showed significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.