Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37892723›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

What Really Matters to Survivors of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection-A Survey of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Dutch National Aortic Dissection Advocacy Group.

Jennifer S Breel, Eline S de Klerk, Magnus Strypet, Frederiek de Heer, Henning Hermanns, Markus W Hollmann, Susanne Eberl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. From survival to lifelong care: The role of patient organisations in aortic dissection.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer S BreelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eline S de KlerkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9322-4577
Magnus StrypetDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederiek de HeerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henning HermannsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4297-495X
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8248-0244
Susanne EberlDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6609-5888
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) almost always requires emergency surgery, and postoperative complications are common. Quality assurance systems tend to measure only the hard outcomes, e.g., complications and mortality. Our aim was to assess the health-related quality of life of TAAAD survivors. (2) Methods: An anonymized, Dutch language, web-based survey was sent out to all of the participants of the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Dutch National Aortic Dissection (DNAD) advocacy group via their own representatives. The survey was divided into five sections: patient information, global satisfaction, surgery, including complications, and the recovery period. (3) Results: Ninety members of the DNAD group attended the meeting. Seventy-five (83%) participated in the survey, and the responses from 61 (81%) were available for analysis. Despite hindrances in their daily life (complications, changes in physical, cognitive, and social functioning), patients were satisfied with their treatment, and all would undergo the procedure again. In addition they requested better post-discharge guidance and communication (4) Conclusion: The emphasis lies in equipping patients with knowledge about potential outcomes and effective coping strategies. This underscores the importance of communication and expectation management, in line with established literature.

Indexed as

cardiac surgerycommunicationexpectationshealth related quality of lifepostoperative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID37892723
PMCPMC10607692
OpenAlexW4387737912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.