Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37892638›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Gait and Balance Ability in Patients Who Underwent Corrective Long Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Tomoyoshi Sakaguchi, Umesh Meena, Masato Tanaka, Hongfei Xiang, Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Shinya Arataki, Takuya Taoka, Kazuhiko Takamatsu, Yosuke Yasuda, Masami Nakagawa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomoyoshi SakaguchiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6935-0442
Umesh MeenaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Masato TanakaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6685-7451
Hongfei XiangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Yoshihiro FujiwaraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Shinya AratakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Takuya TaokaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Kazuhiko TakamatsuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Yosuke YasudaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Masami NakagawaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Kayo UtsunomiyaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Okayama Rosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective observational study.

backgroundThe risk of a femoral neck fracture due to a fall after adult spinal deformity surgery has been reported. One of the most significant factors among walking and balance tests in post-operative ASD patients was the timed up-and-go test (TUG). This study aims to calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in balance tests after ASD surgery.

methodsForty-eight patients, 4 males and 44 females, were included by exclusion criteria in 66 consecutive patients who underwent corrective surgery as a treatment for ASD at our institution from June 2017 to February 2022. The inclusion criteria for this study were age ≥50 years; and no history of high-energy trauma. The exclusion criteria were dementia, severe deformity of the lower extremities, severe knee or hip osteoarthritis, history of central nervous system disorders, cancer, and motor severe paralysis leading to gait disorders. The surgeries were performed in two stages, first, the oblique lumber interbody fusion (OLIF) L1 to L5 (or S1), and second, the posterior corrective fusion basically from T10 to pelvis. For outcome assessment, 10 m walk velocity, TUG, ODI, and spinopelvic parameters were used.

resultsTen meter walk velocity of pre-operation and post-operation were 1.0 ± 0.3 m/s and 1.2 ± 0.2 m/s, respectively (

conclusionsThis is the first report of MCID of the 10 m walk velocity and TUG after ASD surgery. Ten meter walk velocity and the TUG improved after surgery; their improvement values were correlated with the ODI. MCID using the anchor-based approach for 10 m walk velocity and the TUG were 0.10 m/s and 2.0 s, respectively. These MCID values may be useful for rehabilitation after ASD surgery.

Indexed as

adult spinal deformityminimal clinically important difference (MCID)rehabilitationspinal balancesurgery

Identifiers

PMID37892638
PMCPMC10607759
OpenAlexW4387568616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.