Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37892333›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Child Rights during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning from Child Health-and-Rights Professionals across the World.

Eva Jörgensen, Laura Wood, Margaret A Lynch, Nicholas Spencer, Geir Gunnlaugsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nurse leaders' perceptions of organisational policies, guidelines, and practices that enact children and young people's involvement in hospitals.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2026
    Article
  2. Greek Child and Adolescent Well-Being in the Post-pandemic Normalcy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva JörgensenFaculty of Sociology, Anthropology and Folkloristics, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Sæmundargata 2-6, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-2950-4814
Laura WoodDepartment of Sociology, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8947-2677
Margaret A LynchDepartment of Paediatrics, King's College, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-1049
Nicholas SpencerDivision of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 9JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2748-6349
Geir GunnlaugssonFaculty of Sociology, Anthropology and Folkloristics, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Sæmundargata 2-6, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-6674-2862

Funding

The Icelandic Research Fund (Rannis) 217579-051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the importance of a child rights-based approach to policymaking and crisis management. Anchored in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the 3P framework-provision, protection, and participation-forms the foundation for health professionals advocating for children's rights. Expanding it with two additional domains-preparation and power-into a 5P framework has the potential to enhance child rights-based policies in times of crisis and future pandemics. The study aimed to (1) gather perspectives from child health-and-rights specialists on how children's rights were highlighted during the early phase of the pandemic in their respective settings; and (2) evaluate the usefulness of the 5P framework in assessing children's visibility and rights. A qualitative survey was distributed among child health-and-rights professionals; a total of 68 responses were analysed in Atlas.ti 9 from a multi-disciplinary group of policymakers and front-line professionals in eight world regions. As framed by the 5Ps, children's rights were generally not safeguarded in the initial pandemic response and negatively impacted children's health and wellbeing. Further, children lacked meaningful opportunities to raise their concerns to policymakers. The 5P framework holds the potential to shape an ethical child rights-based decision-making framework for future crises, both nationally and globally.

Indexed as

child advocacychild healthchild health professionalsconvention on the rights of the childCOVID-19policymakingqualitative researchsocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID37892333
PMCPMC10605735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.