Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37892200›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2023

Nano-Architecture of Persistent Focal DNA Damage Regions in the Minipig Epidermis Weeks after Acute γ-Irradiation.

Harry Scherthan, Beatrice Geiger, David Ridinger, Jessica Müller, Diane Riccobono, Felix Bestvater, Matthias Port, Michael Hausmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Low-Dose CT Radiation on Gene Expression and DNA Integrity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Wogonin inhibits radiation-induced DNA damage repair in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by upregulating p21.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harry ScherthanBundeswehr Institute for Radiobiology Affiliated to the University of Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, D-80937 München, Germany.
Beatrice GeigerKirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
David RidingerKirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-3168
Jessica MüllerBundeswehr Institute for Radiobiology Affiliated to the University of Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, D-80937 München, Germany.
Diane RiccobonoDépartement des Effets Biologiques des Rayonnements, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, UMR 1296, BP 73, 91223 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0271-8951
Felix BestvaterCore Facility Light Microscopy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias PortBundeswehr Institute for Radiobiology Affiliated to the University of Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, D-80937 München, Germany.
Michael HausmannKirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9430-1987
Heidelberg University · DEUniversität Ulm · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to high acute doses of ionizing radiation (IR) can induce cutaneous radiation syndrome. Weeks after such radiation insults, keratinocyte nuclei of the epidermis exhibit persisting genomic lesions that present as focal accumulations of DNA double-strand break (DSB) damage marker proteins. Knowledge about the nanostructure of these genomic lesions is scarce. Here, we compared the chromatin nano-architecture with respect to DNA damage response (DDR) factors in persistent genomic DNA damage regions and healthy chromatin in epidermis sections of two minipigs 28 days after lumbar irradiation with ~50 Gy γ-rays, using single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) combined with geometric and topological mathematical analyses. SMLM analysis of fluorochrome-stained paraffin sections revealed, within keratinocyte nuclei with perisitent DNA damage, the nano-arrangements of pATM, 53BP1 and Mre11 DDR proteins in γ-H2AX-positive focal chromatin areas (termed macro-foci). It was found that persistent macro-foci contained on average ~70% of 53BP1, ~23% of MRE11 and ~25% of pATM single molecule signals of a nucleus. MRE11 and pATM fluorescent tags were organized in focal nanoclusters peaking at about 40 nm diameter, while 53BP1 tags formed nanoclusters that made up super-foci of about 300 nm in size. Relative to undamaged nuclear chromatin, the enrichment of DDR protein signal tags in γ-H2AX macro-foci was on average 8.7-fold (±3) for 53BP1, 3.4-fold (±1.3) for MRE11 and 3.6-fold (±1.8) for pATM. The persistent macro-foci of minipig epidermis displayed a ~2-fold enrichment of DDR proteins, relative to DSB foci of lymphoblastoid control cells 30 min after 0.5 Gy X-ray exposure. A lasting accumulation of damage signaling and sensing molecules such as pATM and 53BP1, as well as the DSB end-processing protein MRE11 in the persistent macro-foci suggests the presence of diverse DNA damages which pose an insurmountable problem for DSB repair.

Indexed as

DNA RepairHistonesAnimalsChromatinDiscoidin Domain ReceptorsDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, RadiationEpidermisSwineSwine, MiniatureChromatinDiscoidin Domain ReceptorsHistones53BP1ATMcutaneous radiation syndromeDNA damage responseMRE11persistent DNA damagepersistent homologypig skinRipley statisticsSingle Molecule Localization Microscopy (SMLM)γ-H2AXγ-irradiation

Identifiers

PMID37892200
PMCPMC10605239
OpenAlexW4387617150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.