Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37892103›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Prevalence of the Bifid Mandibular Condyle and Its Relationship with Pathologies of the Temporomandibular Joint: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Juan José Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Kora-Lle Keller Navarro, Pia Urbina, Martin Trujillo-Riveros, Pablo Nova-Baeza, Mathias Orellana-Donoso, Macarena Rodriguez-Luengo, Alvaro Beccerra Farfan, Juan A Sanchis-Gimeno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juan José Valenzuela-FuenzalidaDepartment of Morphology and Function, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago 8370040, Chile.
Kora-Lle Keller NavarroDepartment of Morphology and Function, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago 8370040, Chile.
Pia UrbinaDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Martin Trujillo-RiverosDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.ORCID 0009-0002-2107-8643
Pablo Nova-BaezaDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-0098-0224
Mathias Orellana-DonosoDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Macarena Rodriguez-LuengoDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile.
Alvaro Beccerra FarfanDepartamento de Ciencias Química y Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins, Santiago 8370993, Chile.
Juan A Sanchis-GimenoDepartment of Human Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2599-8474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of anatomical variants in the bifid mandibular condyle (BMC) and report its association with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology.

methodsWe searched the Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and LILACS databases from their inception up to September 2023. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction, and they also assessed the methodological quality with an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). Finally, the pooled prevalence was estimated using a random effects model.

resultsA total of 50 studies met the eligibility criteria. Twenty studies, with a total of 88,625 subjects, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of the bifid mandibular condyle (BMC) variant was 1% (95% CI = 1% to 2%).

conclusionsThe correlation between the BMC and TMJ pathologies has a relatively low prevalence in studies that present a considerable number of subjects. From a clinical point of view, a direct association cannot be made between the presence of the BMC and TMJ pathologies or symptoms.

Indexed as

anatomical variationanatomy mandibular condylebifid mandibular condyleclinical anatomytemporomandibular joint pathologiestrifid mandibular condylevariation mandibular condyle

Identifiers

PMID37892103
PMCPMC10606711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.